The Best Car Finance Blog In The World

https://instagram.com/grahamhill999/

By Graham Hill

Before you think I’m getting all political – I’m not. I’m talking about one of the major successes of EU membership and that is safety systems on cars. Across the whole of the EU safety standards have been set to protect drivers, passengers and other road users – very successfully. But will this still be the case after Brexit when we take over the rules and regulations ourselves?

My hope is that we will continue to maintain the high standards that, like many EU laws, we were responsible for in the first place. If you drove around Spain or Italy in the 70’s and 80’s you would have taken yours and everyone else’s lives around you in your hands the moment you got behind the wheel.

But with the introduction of consistency throughout Europe when it comes to car safety you can feel relatively safe in every country you drive in. But will this apply moving forward? There have been times when the UK manufacturers have questioned some of the enforced safety features imposed upon us by the EU but will that mean that there will be two levels of safety applied when we build cars in the UK?

Safety costs money so if the car manufacturers can save money – will they do so, especially if the safety feature doesn’t count towards the global NCAP safety tests. If we export to Europe we will need to meet the EU standards but will they apply in the UK especially as we are more and more price driven? As an example take the Indian car market where above all else cost is the main factor followed by cost to run, mileage and performance.

Safety is way down the list of priorities so manufacturers manufacture to meet the needs. And that includes European manufacturers. In a recent case a VW Polo was reported to be given 0 stars on the global NCAP test without it affecting sales. I believe they improved the safety of the cars and as a result achieved a higher score but that was a good case of car manufacturers meeting demand. In the UK Polos achieve either 4 or 5 NCAP safety stars.

By removing ourselves from Europe I sincerely hope that we don’t remove ourselves from some of the good things they were responsible for. I wouldn’t like to think that it would be safer to drive a new car in Europe than in the UK. By Graham Hill

£500 Overspend On Petrol: Drivers can spend £500 per annum more than necessary depending on where they fill up.

Daily Insurance Claims Hit £33m Per Day: Car insurance payouts ran at £33m every day in 2016 whilst premiums hit a record high.

1.4 Million Drivers Attended Re-Training Courses: Drivers who were caught committing motoring offences attended courses raising £54 million for the police in the process

9,050 Drink Drive Casualties: The highest on record since 2012 with 2016 7% higher than 2015.

Council Parking Revenue Up To £1.58 Bn In 2017: New figures revealed that this produced a surplus of £819 million.

1,024 Children Banned From Driving: Even though they weren’t old enough to drive

39% Drop In Phone Penalties: Motorists caught using a mobile phone whilst driving dropped from 49,694 in 2016 to 30,470 in 2017. This was put down to fines and points doubling. Or maybe it’s down to fewer police and hands-free fitted to more cars.

109 Driving Instructor Investigations: The DVSA cracked down on inappropriate relations between driving instructors and students.

Superfluous Road Signs: 4.3 million road signs were shown by the Department for Transport to be superfluous.

15% Of Motorists Report Being Blinded By Headlights: According to research carried out by the RAC

The Average Fine For Car Theft Was £198: With 80% of crooks receiving a fine rather than a jail sentence.

The Average Age Of Cars On UK Roads Is 8.1 Years: The Department for Transport revealed that the average age increased from 7.8 years in 2015 and 6.8 years in 2003.

8,000 Crooked Car Washes: The CarWash Advisory Service estimated that 8,000 of the 20,000 hand car washes are involved in illegal activities.

5.65 Million Parking Tickets Handed Out In 2017: The Government has pledged to clamp down on private firms.

Pothole Claims Run At £1million Per Month: The AA revealed the scale of the claims.

89,000 Vehicles Stolen In 2017: Vehicle theft went up from 56,000 in 2016 to 89,000 in 2017. Blamed on police cuts and thieves managing to crack keyless technology.

80% Of New Cars Were Bought On Finance: According to Auto Express I gave tips on PCP deals along with revelations. An influencer!

London Reduced Speed Limit: Sadiq Khan said that all roads managed by Transport for London would have a 20mph speed limit

Drivers Overspend £3.4bn On Repairs: Green Flag indicates that drivers spend £3.4bn more than they need to.

20% Reduced Reaction Times: University of Bath reported this drop in reaction time as a result of a hangover.

£106 million Government Investment In EV’s: This investment in vehicle and battery development was matched by £500 million investment from industry.

27% Of Those Killed On Our Roads Were Not Wearing Seatbelts: 1,793 people lost their lives on the roads in 2017, 27% were found not to be wearing seatbelts.

Audi Fined £700m For False Emission Figures: German authorities imposed the fine on Audi for ‘deviations from regulatory requirements’ over V6 & V8 diesel engine emissions.

Diesel MOT Failures Hit 238,871: Following new MOT rules – a fourfold increase.

2.3 Million Cars Clocked: One in 16 cars display a false mileage reading with the Local Government Association calling for the ban of mileage correction devices.

So there you have it – some of the major issues and statistics of 2018. What will 2019 bring us – well we will find out soon enough! By Graham Hill

If you were told this by the manufacturer of your car and that he would fix the problem if you popped it into your nearest dealer for free, why wouldn’t you go? Or if you needed to check a website to see if your car was one that had the fault wouldn’t you check it?

Well in 2013 this problem was identified. Takata airbags were fitted to 66 global models and all could have the fault so a massive recall got underway. In the UK 2.9 million cars were affected but to date, 991,333 cars remain unrepaired – could yours be one of them?

You may recall in 2015 Vauxhall hit the headlines as a result of their Zafiras built between 2005 and 2014 possibly having faulty heating components fitted causing the cars to catch light. The affected cars were identified and recall notices were sent out to 234,000 drivers. 30,686 have still not been repaired so any of those could catch fire at any time. Might be a good idea to check your car out if you’re driving a Zafira.

As with the Zafira, BMW issued a recall in 2018 on their 3 series built between 2004 and 2011. Again faulty heater wiring could lead to a fire but of the 279,104 cars affected 197,352 remain unrepaired. According to the DVSA there are still 2.39 million cars subject to safety recalls that have still not been repaired, an estimated 1 in 13 cars.

According to Auto Express, Edmund King – AA President, said that ‘Generally the recall system in the UK works quite well…’ What? A third of cars that have a potential fault that could result in shrapnel being fired into the face of the driver or passengers doesn’t suggest to me that the system is working quite well!

As a result of this highly dangerous situation, the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) is proposing to align two of their systems, the recall register and MOT test records. They propose that if a car is subject to a recall it is noted in the advisory section of the MOT certificate. If it appears the following year the car should fail the test.

Personally, I don’t feel this goes far enough, the recalls should be aligned with road fund licence and if the car hasn’t been repaired the driver can’t renew the tax – surely if the car is a danger to the driver, occupants and other road users they should not be allowed on the road. If we rely upon the MOT test the car will be 3 years old before the note is made on the certificate.

If you would like to check to see if your car has a recall go to: https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/   By Graham Hill

There are many drivers who would never entertain driving a new car – usually for all the wrong reasons. ‘They depreciate quicker than a used car’ – not necessarily so if you go for a nearly new used car! I’ll have a training video for that! They cost more to service! Some new cars can be 2 years old before they need their first service which is just an oil and filter change. And a new car certainly doesn’t cost more to maintain and is covered for at least 3 years, 60,000 miles by the manufacturer’s warranty.

But even worse than this is the number of used cars that are ‘clocked’. This is the name given to the practice of reducing the miles showing on the car’s odometer. It is illegal to do so then sell the car on with the customer believing that the mileage on the clock is genuine.

The Local Government Association (IGA) which represents 370 councils in England and Wales found a large surge in the number of vehicles that had been clocked. In fact 0ne in 16 cars are clocked according to the IGA at a cost to buyers of £800 million every year. This is the difference between the value of cars on their genuine mileage and the value on the clocked mileage.

But more important for me is the potential danger of driving a car that has had the mileage adjusted. Many service and maintenance alerts are mileage based so by winding back the mileage it can throw out the alerts which means you could be driving a car that is seriously dangerous not only to the driver and passengers but also pedestrians and other road users.

This situation has been in existence since before I learned to drive with my dad and that was a very long time ago. And the same loophole still exists in the law. It is technically illegal to sell a car that has had the mileage clocked it is still legal to alter the mileage of your car. The EU was to introduce a law in May making it illegal to advertise the electronic devices used to clock cars but that legislation has been delayed.

Councillor Simon Blackburn from the LGA said ‘Car clocking is a major rising fraud, that not only rips off motorists but can have dangerous implications. The proposed EU ban on mileage correction services needs to be made part of UK law as soon as possible’. Automotive data company, HPI, found one in 16 cars had a mileage discrepancy, with the number of clocking incidents rising by 25% between 2014 & 2016. Something needs to be done urgently – lives could be at risk.

In a final piece of research I have found a warning from Autonet Insurance Group saying that if you buy a car that has been clocked, so the declared mileage to the insurer is incorrect, you risk making your insurance cover invalid. So you need to make sure you take every precaution to ensure that the mileage is correct. You have been warned. By Graham Hill

A new police unit has been set up to deal with dash cam and helmet cam footage showing drivers committing offences as part of a Government road safety initiative.

The announcement of the creation of this new unit was made by the Department for Transport (DfT) as a 2-year plan to make roads safer. In their announcement, they stated that it is intended, ‘ to combat road rage, encourage greater mutual respect between road users and protect the most vulnerable’.

The task force does not yet have a name but will be a ‘national back office’ serving police forces. An initial investment of £100,000 has been put in to test the waters. No information is yet available as to how the public will get the video footage to this team but according to AutoExpress they feel the new scheme will operate in the same way as Operation Snap that was introduced in Wales.

When piloted it reduced the time taken to review footage from up to 15 hours (really?) to just 15 minutes. There are 7 offences that the public can report using video footage as follows

Dangerous Driving

Driving Without Due Care & Attention

Careless Driving

Using A Mobile Phone

Not Wearing A Seatbelt

Contravening A Red Traffic Light

Contravening Solid White Lines

The DfT says that dash cam footage and video from motorcyclist and cyclist cameras could lead to investigations for ‘other offences where the driver is clearly not in proper control of the vehicle and which could lead to collisions’. By allowing drivers to submit video footage they believe that they will be able to increase detection rates at no extra cost.

The 2-year plan also includes allowing local authorities to issue tickets to drivers parking in cycle lanes with penalties from £70 to £130 in London. Councils will also be encouraged to spend 15% of their local transport budget on cycling and walking infrastructure. Personally, the whole thing concerns me as I can see a rapid increase in road rage. By Graham Hill

A Government Select Committee investigation has revealed that hand car washes can be ‘modern slavery in plain sight’. As a result of which they have called for them to be licenced. The Environmental Audit Committee’s probe into working practices at hand car washes (HCW) was told they play host to a ‘spectrum of exploitation’.

They raised concerns regarding the non-payment of minimum wage, workers at risk of trench foot and chemical burns. And untreated wash water having toxic effects on plant and animal life. As a result, the industry and various Government bodies launched a pilot Responsible Car Wash Scheme earlier this year with washes urged to sign up to a set of standards and display a Reasonable Car Wash Operator logo at their sites.

The Environmental Audit Committee recommended a trial licensing scheme for HCW’s to tackle the ‘widespread and flagrant rule breaking’ across the industry. The committee says that authorities should start by ensuring that car washes in supermarket car parks are compliant with labour laws. Much more to come I suspect.

I’ve done this myself and got really angry in the worst town in the world for driver convictions (in my opinion) – Croydon. I was fairly close behind a bus travelling through the town and as we crossed over a crossroad into the same road without seeing any sign to show that the road opposite was simply a two-way bus lane. Of course by the time I saw that the road was simply a bus lane it was too late. A No Entry sign showing ‘Except buses, taxis and cycles’ underneath would have been handy.

So I wasn’t surprised to read that drivers were fined £42 million for driving in bus lanes last year. One road alone generated £1.48 million in fines. Last year there were 888,760 notices issued. In London the fines for driving in a bus lane reached £7.57 million with Ealing council responsible for more than 40% (£3.1 million) of London’s total.

In Glasgow drivers were fined £6.52 million whilst Cardiff drivers had to part with £5.59 million for driving in a bus lane. Confused.com were behind the figures collated after a Freedom of Information request. It also found out that 39% of drivers admitted driving in a bus lane whilst 48% said they had done so unwittingly. 41% said that they had done so because of unclear markings or signage – I know what they mean.

Confused.com’s motoring editor, Amanda Stretton, suggested that bus lanes present the most confusing challenge to motorists. She also suggested that the money raised should be used to improve signage and questioned the level of fines as motorists felt they were ‘unfair and excessive’. The High Street in Oxford was the road that generated the most revenue at £1.48 million. Potentially because only buses, taxis and cycles are permitted to enter sections of the street between 7.30am and 6.30pm.

You’ve been warned. By Graham Hill

I’ve warned about this before but since the tightening of Data Protection rules with GDPR it’s worth mentioning again. It all started a few years ago when the wife of a well-known football player part exchanged her car for a new one. When she sold the car she didn’t think of clearing down the information stored in her in-car telephone book.

The dealer who bought the car as a part exchange realised that he could access the telephone numbers and seeing that there were many mobile numbers of A-list celebrities he offered them to a National newspaper. When it came to light what had happened, after journalists were contacting the celebrities, a court case ensued. The dealer argued that as he bought the car he also bought the data stored in the car. The onus was on the previous owner to remove anything that wasn’t included as she would have done with any personal effects.

Data protection rules were not so tough at the time but even so the dealer was seen to be breaking data protection regulations and was fined. Since then, of course, the amount of data stored on your car has increased. Addresses, places you have visited along with telephone numbers and in some cases driving style. You may think that most of this information is pretty benign but it may not be.

If you own company cars or you are a company car driver there is an onus on the employer to ensure that they protect driver’s personal data. There is a now a company that will cleanse ex-fleet cars and remove all data but they only deal with company cars. If you are concerned about your data stored in your car you can always remove it yourself or ask your local dealer to remove it for you before you return it at the end of your lease or PCP or part exchange it.

If the car is part exchanged the dealer is responsible for ensuring that the data is removed before selling it on. With fines of up to 2% of global annual turnover this could end up having a major effect on employers and/or dealers. By Graham Hill

Have you ever had a headlight bulb blow on your car? In truth, if you only ever drive new cars with a full manufacturer’s warranty you could be excused for believing that they would be covered for the term of the warranty so it wouldn’t matter if a bulb did blow. But if you think that – you might like to check the terms of your warranty.

Some manufacturers cover your light bulbs till the warranty runs out but others will cover the bulbs for a fixed term or until you reach the first service. They all seem to have a different approach. So I found it interesting to read the results of an investigation carried out by What Car.

Now, under normal circumstances, I wouldn’t bother reporting on such an article. Especially as I had a bulb blow on my Mercedes after about 2 years. I simply popped into Halfords, bought a bulb for about £18 and they fitted it for me. In fact it took no more than seconds to disconnect the connector, flip a clip, replace the bulb, clip it in place, reconnect the connector and it was all done.

However, a friend with a Renault Megane found that in order to replace a headlamp bulb you have to practically dismantle the whole of the front of the car which can be extremely expensive, especially if this replacement isn’t part of the warranty. And it isn’t a job you could do yourself unless you are an engineer.

But it gets worse. When What Car carried out its survey it found that exchange bulbs varied greatly. The cheapest they found was a Suzuki Swift Halogen bulb, costing £4 with prices increasing up to a maximum of £20 for a Citroen C3 Halogen bulb. But that’s just Halogen bulbs.

If your car has High-Intensity Discharge bulbs fitted you could be in for a shock. According to some bulb manufacturers, the bulbs should last for 10 years whilst others say they should last the lifetime of the car.

So you may not have to replace a bulb but if you do it will be then that you will find out that you can’t simply replace the bulb, you have to replace the whole sealed unit  which, according to What Car, can cost from £211 on an Audi A1 S-Line to £846 for a replacement unit fitted to a Polo GTI. A Vauxhall Corsa can cost £317 whilst a Honda Jazz can be £714. And those prices don’t include fitting.

At these prices, it has been known that used cars with a blown bulb have been written off as it costs more to replace the bulb or headlamp unit than the car is worth. This is what What Car says: If you’re going to keep your car for many years or are buying second hand, we’d recommend avoiding models and trim levels that have sealed headlamp units. Stick with halogen bulbs if you want the cheapest replacement bulb costs, or go for a model such as the Mini Hatchback that lets you replace HID bulbs separately.

They go on to say that ‘If your car fails its MOT test because the lights aren’t bright enough, rather than replacing the light units, you can buy a headlight restoration kit for less than £20. You can use this kit to polish up yellowed or lightly scratched headlight lenses so they’re crystal clear again’. But of course, this won’t help if the bulb has blown.

Yet again a hidden cost that really should be made apparent when you buy your new or used car. And it raises the big question that I’ve been discussing around warranties. If your warranty has bulbs covered till your first service and a bulb goes after the service is this an enhancement of your legal rights – which is what a warranty should be? I would suggest not.

Don’t forget (see my PCP Report free on grahamhilltraining.com) that at the moment you are covered by the EU 2 year guarantee that comes with anything you buy, new or used, from a trader or business (not privately). By Graham Hill