Diesel Part 2 – Manufacturers Have Clawed Back Some Of Those Switching To Petrol

Thursday, 2. May 2019

Fleets and some consumers are taking delivery of the first RDE2 diesel cars, cutting vehicle excise duty (VED) and company car tax, with manufacturers promising that more models will follow.

 

Mercedes-Benz stole a march late last year, when it added two new diesel engines to the A-Class range – the A 200d and the A 220d – which met stricter emissions limits, well before they become the legal requirement.

 

The new units have been tested to the RDE2 standard, meaning company car drivers will benefit from tax savings thanks to the removal of the 4% benefit-in-kind (BIK) tax diesel surcharge.

 

Fleets will also benefit from not having to pay the higher first-year rate of VED on new diesel cars not meeting the RDE2 standard.

 

The German carmaker says it now has eight RDE2-compliant cars available to order: A200d, A220d (both available as saloon or hatch), B200d, B220d, GLE 350d and GLE 400d. The first deliveries were made in February.

 

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has also been quick out of the blocks, announcing in January that the all-new XF 2.0-litre diesel 163PS and 180PS rear-wheel drive variants had been certified as RDE2-compliant.

 

It says this could save 40% taxpayers up to £2,304 in company car tax over three years compared with models which are subject to the 4% diesel surcharge.

 

JLR subsequently announced that the revised XE would also be available with an RDE2-compliant 180PS diesel engine, as well as 163PS and 180PS XF Sportbrake models and the new 150PS Evoque.

 

The manufacturer told Fleet News that further announcements on RDE2-compliant cars are “imminent” and deliveries of the first tax-busting models would be made by the end of this month.

 

It says its latest diesel engines offer approximately 25% better fuel economy than their petrol equivalents, produce around 15% less CO2 and emit around the same amount of NOx.

 

Rawdon Glover, managing director of JLR UK, attributed its success to “significant investment” in advanced engine technology.

 

“These new diesel engines meet the demanding target, set by the latest European standards, well ahead of schedule,” he said. “The test results reflect their performance in real-world driving conditions.”

 

BMW told Fleet News that the new 1 Series will be its first model that is classified as RDE2. A spokesman said: “We will introduce RDE2 technology into the BMW range from the middle of this year, with the first customer deliveries in Q3.

 

“There will be a staggered roll-out of this technology across the range but the full model range will, of course, be compliant ahead of the required deadline.”

 

Vauxhall is also advanced with its plans, with the new Astra, due for launch this summer (first deliveries Q4), the first of its RDE2-compliant models. “Then it comes model by model,” said the company.

 

However, Audi admitted it was still in the “preparatory phase” after dealing with re-homologation under the Worldwide harmonised Light vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP).

 

A spokesman said: “We continue to work at full speed on this to close the remaining gaps in our product range and to minimise delays.” By Graham Hill (Thanks to Fleet News)

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Claiming Compensation For Pothole Damage

Thursday, 25. April 2019

In 2012, a lawsuit was brought up against a McDonalds restaurant due to a slip and fall injury. In the suit a 54 year old woman claimed to have suffered a severe injury to her spine.

 

Over the course of the investigation, it was determined that the owner had received the proper guidelines on maintaining a clean working environment while keeping things safe and clean.

 

The final verdict came in that the staff of McDonald’s failed to follow the inspection protocol and there was spilt food/drink and the woman won $2.6 million in economic damages and $3 million for non-economic damages for diminished quality of life.

 

Whilst compensation in the UK is nothing like the compensation paid out in this case similar rules apply in slip and fall cases. And if my memory serves me correctly the lady involved actually spilt the ketchup in the first place.

So what has this got to do with potholes? When the roads in this country first started to deteriorate local authorities found it cheaper to pay for the occasional tyre blowout and bent alloy than repair the roads. You would take a photo of the pothole and send it with a receipt for the repair and the local authority paid out instantly.

 

Similar to the responsibility of those who maintain public spaces to make them safe for the public you would assume that the same applies to local authorities when it comes to potholes. But it seems to have changed and the same rules of responsibility apply. You now have to prove that the local authority was already aware of the pothole and did nothing about it. Or doesn’t have a maintenance programme in place. This has got to be wrong.

 

I always recommend that you take legal cover with your car insurance as they can give you legal advice in these circumstances and even send you a legal letter that you can use when claiming compensation. If you have a winnable case they may even take the council to court on your behalf..

 

If you haven’t got legal cover you can upgrade your policy or the RAC offers a very good policy for just £15 per annum. Always take advice from a financial advisor before taking out insurance. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Do You Really Know How Vulnerable Your Car Is To Cyber Attack?

Thursday, 25. April 2019

It wasn’t that long ago when it was only top of the range cars that had mobile Bluetooth connectivity which meant that the internal storage in the car would store all of your phone book. You, therefore, had to delete your phonebook if you didn’t want the new owner to have access to your list of family, friends and contacts.

 

Things have now moved on and even the most modest of cars has a pile of data stored about you. What Car has looked into this and come up with a list of things you can do to protect yourself from a cyber attack.

 

  • Keep in touch with your car’s manufacturer regularly to check whether it has issued software updates or recalls to improve security. Alternatively, you can see if your car has an outstanding recall notice at gov.uk/check-vehicle-recall.

 

  • To minimise the impact if your car and/or sat-nav is stolen, use any security features your sat-nav offers and think about regularly wiping all the data, such as your home address, from the system.

 

  • If your car has built-in wi-fi, never leave the default password on it and never leave a note of the new password inside the car.

 

  • Turn your car’s wi-fi and Bluetooth off when you’re not using them.

 

  • If you download any smartphone apps that will be processing payments for your car, such as road toll fees, make sure they’re password-protected.

 

  • Make sure your smartphone’s operating system and apps are the latest versions; updates are often issued to patch possible security vulnerabilities that can give cyber criminals access to your phone.

 

  • Protect your social media accounts by making sure you’ve activated the privacy settings. With Facebook, avoid public updates and only send posts to your friends. With Twitter, you can’t be as selective.

 

  • Protect your home by making your car’s sat-nav less accurate. If you don’t want cyber criminals to know where you live, instead of setting your home address to your house, consider setting the shortcut to a nearby junction or the closest motorway exit.

 

What to do if you’re selling your car or returning a hire car

 

  • If you’ve paired your phone to the car to access hands-free operation, go into the Bluetooth set-up menu and remove your phone from the paired phones list, as well as deleting your contacts if they’ve been downloaded onto the system.

 

  • Check the car’s manual to find out how to clear all your private data from the infotainment system. It might be listed as a ‘factory reset’ option.

 

  • If your car has web-connected services that bring data from your favourite apps and social networks to the dashboard, disconnect this. If you don’t, other drivers might be able to gain access to your Facebook and Google accounts. To wipe the information, you’ll need to reset the infotainment system to its factory-fresh state.

 

  • If your vehicle has an integrated remote control that you’ve paired with your front gate or garage door, your vehicle is essentially a gigantic key to your house. Check the instruction manuals for your electric gate or garage door for resetting instructions.

 

By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Bugs Throwing Themselves On Your Windscreen Could Land You With A Fine & Points

Thursday, 25. April 2019

It’s that time of year when sap starts falling from the trees, birds feel the need to leave a present on your windscreen and bugs start committing suicide by throwing themselves on your windscreen. The net result is a difficult to see through windscreen.

 

If this happens you need to clean it as quickly as possible because it’s illegal to drive your car when the screen is difficult to see through with some hefty penalties.

 

Car owners have a responsibility to make sure their driving doesn’t negatively impact other motorists.

 

One way this could happen is by having a dirty windscreen or another glass surface which is required to be clear while on the road, such as the side mirrors or rear windscreen.

 

Having a filthy windscreen could impair your vision and similarly your decision making and reaction times and could lead to an accident.

 

Regulation 30 of The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, says that drivers are required to keep class surfaces clean and clear.

 

“All glass or other transparent material fitted to a motor vehicle shall be maintained in such condition that it does not obscure the vision of the driver while the vehicle is being driven on a road,” the law states.

 

If you were to have an accident as a result of having a dirty windscreen then you could be fined and charged for careless driving.

 

Punishments for careless driving range from an on-the-spot fine of £100 and three penalty points.

 

However, if your case was to go to court then you could see that fine increase to a massive £5,000 and receive up to nine penalty points.

 

Serious offences could also see you lose your driving licence.

 

Neil Greig, Policy and Research Director at IAM RoadSmart, said: “Careless driving is all about penalising the negative impact you have on other drivers.

 

“If a dirty windscreen is stopping you from driving safely then you should expect to be caught and charged.

 

“Not having clear vision in low sun situations is a really serious issue.

 

“In 2016 ‘dazzling sun’ was recorded by the police as a factor in 28 fatal crashes, 463 serious injury crashes, and just over 2,100 slight injury crashes.

 

“The best solution is to keep your windscreen clean, inside and out, and to carry a pair of sunglasses all year round.”

 

In order to keep your screen clear AutoExpress have tested a number of windscreen washes. Their Best Buy for 2019 was Dirtex Aquaphobic Screen Wash as a cost of £13.95 for a litre. Visit www.chipex.co.uk . Their Recommended award went to Angelwax Clarity at a cost of 7.95 per litre. Both were evenly matched but Dirtex edged out Angelwax as the dilution ratios actually made Dirtex cheaper.

 

So don’t risk a fine and up to 9 points on your licence.   By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Traffic Reduction Scheme Lengthens Journey Times

Thursday, 18. April 2019

Auto Express has highlighted deficiencies in the £317 million traffic reduction scheme that has had the reverse effect in some areas.

Called the National Pinch Point Programme, Highways England has admitted that the programme, designed to reduce congestion actually made traffic worse in some areas. 

 

The Government-owned organisation funded a total of 119 schemes across the UK between 2012/13 and 2014/15, of which 89 per cent were aimed at relieving congestion during specific time periods. It should be noted that traffic jams cost the UK economy £8 billion last year.
Although this aim was achieved during the targeted times, it resulted in worse congestion at other times of day, which Highways England said “outweighed” the benefits. 
Increased journey times during off-peak periods caused economic costs of £5.6m during the first year of the programme, while shorter journeys at peak times resulted in a benefit of £5.1m.
One of the main reasons seen for the increase in congestion during off-peak times was the introduction of new sets of traffic lights.
The analysis comes from a newly published Highways England report, for which the organisation evaluated 54 of the 119 schemes to see what the results were for their first year of operation.
The report concluded that, in future, such programmes need to “better consider how to mitigate the downsides while maintaining the upsides”.
Nicholas Lyes, head of roads policy at the RAC, described the report’s findings as “very disappointing”.
“While congestion has been reduced at peak times of the day, unfortunately, many schemes have seen increased traffic at off-peak periods, mostly due to traffic lights being introduced”, he said.
“Luckily, it seems as though there are some simple steps that can be taken to improve the worst of these new off-peak traffic flow issues, such as changing signals to work part-time instead of full-time.”
He added: “It is also important to realise that this work was not just about reducing congestion and that many schemes have seen small reductions in the number of road casualties.”
Personally, I find it absurd to come up with traffic calming schemes during rush hours but end up with journey times being lengthened at all other times. Also, the report into the schemes found that of the 54 assessed by Highways England, 20 were found to have decreased driver safety.
That is simply not good enough. According to latest figures from the EU we have the safest roads in Europe with 28 road traffic fatalities per million inhabitants. I would say that this is more as a result of luck than judgement.
Our roads are still in an appalling state, we are tinkering around the edges when it comes to congestion, we need new roads, and by fiddling around the way we have been those statistics will start to move in the wrong direction. By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Massive Increase In Dodgy MOT Testers Struck Off By DVSA

Friday, 12. April 2019

The number of MoT testers who have been struck off in the UK has rocketed over the past few years, with 82 per cent more testers banned in the 2017/18 financial year compared with 2015/16.

 

Worse still, experts say dodgy testers could be issuing fake MoTs to written-off cars that should be scrapped, heightening concerns related to the write off scandal that was exposed by Auto Express.

 

Some 178 nominated MoT testers previously authorised by the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) were struck off in 2017/18, up from 98 in 2015/16. And 41 per cent more authorised examiners, who oversee testing stations, had their status withdrawn over the same period. Testers can be warned or banned for issuing fraudulent certificates, as well as improper or careless testing.

 

There are more than 23,000 MoT test stations in the UK, which makes those numbers look slim, but one corrupt tester was recently prosecuted for issuing 310 fake MoTs over 18 months, so discredited testers could have been responsible for tens of thousands of illegitimate MoTs – putting the safety of countless road users at risk.

 

AA president Edmund King said: “While most MoT inspectors do a great job, the rise in inspectors being struck off is worrying.”

 

King highlighted the essential role the MoT test plays in vehicle safety, and said that cars should never pass an MoT because they have been “fraudulently ticked through as a favour for a friend”.

 

He added: “The wider concern is that written-off vehicles could have entered into the second-hand car market, when all they were really good for was scrap.”

 

Jim Punter, editor of MoT Testing magazine, believes the number of improper testers caught by the DVSA is related to how much the agency spends on enforcement. He said: “The DVSA’s own analysis shows the average quality of MoT inspections isn’t as good as it could be.

 

But the number of testers and testing stations taken out of the MoT scheme each year isn’t a reliable measure of the quality of MoT testing. It’s more to do with the amount of money DVSA spends rooting out bad testing, and encouraging honest testers and testing stations to do better.”

 

Neil Barlow, the DVSA’s head of vehicle engineering, said: “Using intelligence and enforcement, we are taking action against testers who put people’s lives at risk.”

Case study

According to Auto Express David Matthew Barrington from Ottery St Mary, Devon, received a 16-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, last month for issuing 310 MoT pass certificates to vehicles he had never even inspected. Barrington, who acted behind the backs of his bosses, was also given a six-month electronic curfew order. Barrington pleaded guilty to issuing 50 fake MoT certificates, with a further 260 taken into consideration by the court.

 

The DVSA said it would contact the owners of the vehicles in question, and would also open a proceeds-of-crime investigation to determine if any money earned by Barrington from the dodgy MoT tests could be recouped.

 

It’s a disgrace that this still goes on with the increased levels of controls and inspections although it’s a credit that so many of these crooks who put people’s lives at risk have been caught out. It’s also an issue for employers who find themselves providing employees with car allowances to avoid increasing BIK tax but still having responsibility for the roadworthiness of employee cars when being used for business. This could leave employers seriously exposed in the event of an accident. By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

MP’s Call On A National Inquiry Into Pavement Parking

Friday, 12. April 2019

According to the Mail Online MPs have launched an investigation into drivers parking on pavements in England. The Transport Select Committee said it will examine the problems caused when vehicles are parked with at least one wheel on a pavement.

 

This is likely to include blocking access for wheelchair users and pushchairs, and damage to surfaces not designed to be driven over. Parking on pavements has been banned in London since 1974.

 

Outside of the capital it is only prohibited for lorries, but people who park in a dangerous position or cause an unnecessary obstruction can be fined. A mixture of criminal and civil sanctions are available to police and local councils to enforce restrictions on pavement parking.

 

Labour MP Lilian Greenwood, who chairs the committee, said: “This is an area where some people’s actions cause real difficulties for others. “Parking on pavements risks the safety of all groups of people from the littlest to the oldest, with differing needs.

 

“While we’re also inquiring into active travel – how we get more people into walking and cycling – we need to make sure it’s safe to take to the streets. “We want to hear from the public about the difficulties this presents and the solutions on offer.” The committee is calling for written evidence on the impact of pavement parking, the enforcement of existing rules and the need for new regulations.

 

AA president Edmund King said drivers should not leave vehicles in a position which is “anti-social” or restricts other people from using a pavement, but a blanket ban on pavement parking “would be a step too far”. He went on: “A street-by-street assessment is needed to decide where it may be suitable to allow pavement parking. Where pavement parking is allowed, seven out of 10 drivers say the bays should be marked out to show how much of the pavement can be used.

 

“Pavement parking poses problems on both inner city streets and rural lanes, so the outcome needs to be tailored to the circumstances.” RAC head of roads policy Nicholas Lyes said: “There are instances, particularly on Britain’s many narrow residential streets, where drivers believe they are doing the right thing by putting a wheel or two on the kerb so as not to impede road access for other vehicles and emergency services, while also making sure they leave enough space for people to use the pavement, especially wheelchair users and those with buggies.

 

“This inquiry should look carefully at how we can strike the right balance.” Personally, I despair of the ignorance of some drivers making it virtually impossible for mums with buggies and those in wheelchairs to get past a car parked three quarters the way across the pavement.

 

I reported a few years ago about a company in Canada who developed an app that enabled members of the public to take pictures on their mobile phones of drivers parking illegally, uploading photos and data onto the local authority website and being paid for the information after the driver had paid his fine that was auto issued. 

 

They tried to introduce the system into the UK without any success but with so few police about these days will there be an opportunity to introduce the app again to capture those parking illegally, smoking in cars with children on board, no seat belt secured, using a mobile phone whilst driving without Bluetooth etc.? It will only take one local authority to take it on board and everyone will become a traffic warden. By Graham Hill 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

New Phone Detection Warning Signs To Be Introduced

Friday, 12. April 2019

New mobile phone detection warning signs are being rolled out by Thames Valley and Hampshire police forces.

 

The system, developed by Westcotec, comprises a sensor capable of detecting vehicles where there are active 2G, 3G and 4G phone signals, and an LED warning sign located a short distance along the road.

As long as the activation meets certain pre-determined parameters, the sensor will pick up that a driver is using a phone for calling, text or data purposes and will activate the warning sign. This shows an illuminated mobile phone icon within a bright red circle and diagonal red line.

 

The device is purely about education, warning drivers and being able to identify when the driver was on the phone. It is the first such system to have a direct interaction with a mobile phone offender.

 

The technology can detect if a driver is using Bluetooth, and will therefore not trigger the warning sign. However, the manufacturer accepts that some activations might be triggered by non-driving occupants.

Norfolk County Council was the first to trial the road signs last year, but this is the first time that the police has decided to deploy the technology.

 

The forces say the two detectors, which cost £6,000 each, will be located on the A34 in Oxfordshire but will be posted at different locations throughout the Thames Valley and Hampshire to start – but more could be rolled out.

 

Matt Barber, deputy police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, told the BBC that the system was “not fool-proof”, but said that the police needed to “make it as socially unacceptable to use your mobile whilst driving as it is to drink and drive”.

 

PC Liz Johnson, a roads safety officer, said research suggested a driver was four times more likely to crash if they were using a phone and twice as likely to be involved in a fatal collision when texting compared with drink-driving.

 

“It is vital that people take notice and stop using their mobile phones whilst driving,” she added.

 

Drivers caught using a mobile phone while driving are currently fined £200 and given six points on their licence. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Sharp Rise In Insurance Payouts Blamed On Keyless Entry

Friday, 5. April 2019

Insurance payouts, as a result of the theft of a vehicle or from a vehicle, increased by a whopping 29% in 2018 over the previous year. Insurance companies blame keyless theft as the main culprit. Some £376 million was paid out in claims following the theft of a vehicle or from a vehicle in 2018.
That is now the highest figure on record and the Association of British Insurers (ABI) which compiled the figures added that a claim for theft was submitted every 6 minutes last year and companies paid out over £1 million a day as settlement.
Laurenz Gerger, the ABI’s policy advisor called the rise ‘worrying’ and went on to call for ‘action,by the car manufacturers to tackle this high-tech vulnerability’. However, he added that drivers themselves could do more by taking some simple precautions to help to combat the crime.
The advice from the ABI is: Park cars in well-lit areas, keep keys far away from windows and external doors, switch keyless keys’ signals off overnight if possible and keep keys in a signal-blocking Faraday bag.
Hope that helps as it’s one of the worst feelings ever when you look for your car and find that it’s been stolen. By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Speed Limiters To Be Fitted As Standard On All New Cars

Friday, 5. April 2019

All new cars sold in the UK from 2022 will have speed limiters fitted as standard. The Department for Transport (DfT) has announced that it will follow the ruling from the European Commission on safety technology regardless of whether we are inside or outside of the EU at the time.
The limiters, called Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) were announced in March and have now been approved by the EU. ISA systems, or as I refer to them, Big Brother uses traffic sign recognition, cameras and/or GPS information to limit the speed of the car in a particular area by reducing the engine power and adjusting the speed if the driver doesn’t do it voluntarily.
TV reports suggested that the driver could override the limiter and motoring organisations suggested that this was needed in cases of emergency where a swift boost of power could avoid an accident and I agree but looking at the ruling more closely – yes the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) recommends a full On/Off switch to allow drivers to override the limiter they actually went on to say,’to aid public acceptance at introduction’, which suggests this is only a temporary measure before being fixed and unable to be switched off.
However, there is also a suggestion that drivers will still be able to override the limiter by pressing hard on the accelerator although the limiter will be switched on every time we start the car. It also seems that there is a difference of opinion between the DfT and the ETSC because in a briefing released by the DfT it said that it saw this change to be a ‘step change in Road Safety’.
However, the DfT said that it expected the limiters ‘to give drivers feedback when the speed limit is exceeded rather than limiting the car’s speed’. The ETSC advises, ‘If the driver does not apply the brakes (when entering a lower limit), the vehicle would, in any case, slow down naturally to the new speed limit by reducing engine power’. Confused or what? I guess this will happen a lot when we take over our own lawmaking.
All new models given type approval from May 2022 onwards must have these systems while cars on the market by that date must have them by May 2024 – no I don’t either but that’s the wording. So given what the DfT has said I’m still none the wiser as to what will happen. Limiters that advise the speed limit or limiters that slow you down? By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks