How Accurate IsYour Car’s Speedo?

Thursday, 16. May 2019

Auto Express investigated how accurate the speedometers were on 10 cars were. They did this by comparing how fast the speedos said they were going with the actual speed, revealed by a VBox meter.

 

Car speedometers are not allowed to ‘under-read’ – they can’t tell you that you’re going more slowly than you really are – but they are allowed to over-read by up to 10 per cent plus 6.25mph. So they could read 50.25mph at 40mph.

 

All the cars that were assessed were well within legal limits, although some read with near-perfect accuracy, while others over-read by 3mph. This, with the different approaches police have to enforcing limits, means some variance will always remain around speeding.

 

Commenting on the investigation, AA president Edmund King said it is “sensible to have some flexibility” with speed-limit enforcement, “as the last thing we need is drivers concentrating solely on the speedo and not the road”.

 

King added that, with speedometers becoming increasingly accurate, “Auto Express’s testing is a valid reminder to drivers not to gamble on their speedo perhaps providing some leeway”.

 

The speedo accuracy test explained:

 

The VBox is a clever piece of kit that uses a GPS signal to measure a car’s speed. It’s very accurate, gauging velocity to within 0.1km/h, so is perfect for assessing speedos.

 

They set their test cars to 30, 50, 60 and 70mph using the built-in speed limiter or cruise control to ensure a steady speed, then used the VBox to measure how fast they were going. This gave them a fair idea of the discrepancy between actual and indicated speed.

 

“Not many drivers have access to a VBox, but a separate smartphone app or sat-nav can give you an idea of how accurate your speedo is. Here are the results of the tests:

 

Model True speed at indicated 30mph True speed at indicated 50mph True speed at indicated 60mph True speed at indicated 70mph
Kia e-Niro First Edition 27mph 47mph 57mph 67mph
BMW i3s 28mph 48mph 58mph 68mph
SEAT Arona 1.0 TSI 115 29mph 49mph 60mph 69mph
SEAT Tarraco 2.0 TDI 150 manual 29mph 49mph 59mph 68mph
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 150 manual 28mph 48mph 57mph 67mph
Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 manual 28mph 48mph 57mph 68mph
Volvo XC40 D4 auto R-Design 30mph 49mph 59mph 69mph
Mazda MX-5 2.0 27mph 48mph 58mph 68mph
Dacia Duster dCi 115 28mph 48mph 58mph 68mph
BMW 330i M Sport 28mph 48mph 57mph 67mph

By Graham Hill & Auto Express

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

What Are The Best Dash Cams To Buy?

Friday, 10. May 2019

Did you know that some insurers reduce their premiums by up to 20% if you have a dash cam fitted in your car? I personally believe that fitting a dash cam as standard in a car should be a legal requirement and could be fitted into the rear of the rear view mirror.

 

Years ago cars didn’t have immobilisers fitted but they are now a statutory requirement along with a car alarm. And it would cost considerably less than the cost of fitting an aftermarket unit.

 

Dash cams can be incredibly useful in the event of an accident in order to help the driver prove his case and the incidents of ‘Cash For Crash’, where a driver pulls in front of an innocent driver and brakes hard causing the car behind to hit the car in front, then every person in the car in front making a whiplash claim, has reduced as a result of dashcams.

 

Dashcam footage has also helped police to apprehend dangerous drivers and drunk drivers following erratic and dangerous driving. But for the cameras to be effective they must be capable of creating clear footage with easy transfer to a mobile device.

 

With this in mind AutoExpress have tested out some of the popular brands and come up with their top 3 cameras.

 

Their Best Buy was the Nextbase 612GW, priced at £249.99. It has a 150 degree lens capture with recording in 4K Ultra HD. In the tests number plates were easy to read as were road signs and pedestrians could be seen I a low light. A polarised filter enhanced colour quality and settings were easily adjusted on the move. The BlackVue had better picture quality but the price difference gave the Nextbase the edge.

 

Recommended was the Blackvue DR900S-1CH with the best picture quality but priced at £399.95. It has a 162 degree lens capture with recording in 4K Ultra HD at 30 frames per second making it the most accurate. In the tests this cam recorded pedestrians and number plates well even in low light as a result of the 8megapixel camera. Settings are changed via a downloadable app. It is WiFi enabled so recordings can be uploaded from the camera to Cloud Storage. In summary the cam and the features justify the high cost – loved by the testers.

 

Also recommended was the Thinkware Q800 Pro at a cost of £269. The unit looks a little messy as it comes with a hardwire lead powered by a plug and play 12v unit. There is no screen and and footage is accessed by the Thinkware app. The unit comes with a Sony Exmor R Starvis sensor to record 1440p quad HD quality footage at 30 frames per second. The review describes the quality as good but behind the first two. Lowlight conditions are the strength of the Thinkware with Night Vision 2.0 is excellent.

 

If you want to see all of the reviews you need to get your hands on the 1st May edition of Auto Express. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Traffic Reduction Scheme Lengthens Journey Times

Thursday, 18. April 2019

Auto Express has highlighted deficiencies in the £317 million traffic reduction scheme that has had the reverse effect in some areas.

Called the National Pinch Point Programme, Highways England has admitted that the programme, designed to reduce congestion actually made traffic worse in some areas. 

 

The Government-owned organisation funded a total of 119 schemes across the UK between 2012/13 and 2014/15, of which 89 per cent were aimed at relieving congestion during specific time periods. It should be noted that traffic jams cost the UK economy £8 billion last year.
Although this aim was achieved during the targeted times, it resulted in worse congestion at other times of day, which Highways England said “outweighed” the benefits. 
Increased journey times during off-peak periods caused economic costs of £5.6m during the first year of the programme, while shorter journeys at peak times resulted in a benefit of £5.1m.
One of the main reasons seen for the increase in congestion during off-peak times was the introduction of new sets of traffic lights.
The analysis comes from a newly published Highways England report, for which the organisation evaluated 54 of the 119 schemes to see what the results were for their first year of operation.
The report concluded that, in future, such programmes need to “better consider how to mitigate the downsides while maintaining the upsides”.
Nicholas Lyes, head of roads policy at the RAC, described the report’s findings as “very disappointing”.
“While congestion has been reduced at peak times of the day, unfortunately, many schemes have seen increased traffic at off-peak periods, mostly due to traffic lights being introduced”, he said.
“Luckily, it seems as though there are some simple steps that can be taken to improve the worst of these new off-peak traffic flow issues, such as changing signals to work part-time instead of full-time.”
He added: “It is also important to realise that this work was not just about reducing congestion and that many schemes have seen small reductions in the number of road casualties.”
Personally, I find it absurd to come up with traffic calming schemes during rush hours but end up with journey times being lengthened at all other times. Also, the report into the schemes found that of the 54 assessed by Highways England, 20 were found to have decreased driver safety.
That is simply not good enough. According to latest figures from the EU we have the safest roads in Europe with 28 road traffic fatalities per million inhabitants. I would say that this is more as a result of luck than judgement.
Our roads are still in an appalling state, we are tinkering around the edges when it comes to congestion, we need new roads, and by fiddling around the way we have been those statistics will start to move in the wrong direction. By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

The Number Of Cars Being Cloned Has Quadrupled Over Last 4 Years

Friday, 5. April 2019

The number of reported cloned cars has risen from 1,255 in 2012/13 to 4,802 between April and December 2018, according to the DVLA. And the police believe that due to underreporting the figure could be substantially higher. The reasons given are the ease that cars can now be stolen and the availability of ‘Show Plates’ online.
If you wanted a set of official plates for your car you have to obtain them from a DVLA registered supplier and they must see proof of ownership before they will supply them. Like the crooks that are able to legally buy mileage adjustment equipment online it is legal to buy show plates online but just not to be fitted to a car.
As a result, it is easy enough and cheap enough to buy ‘show plates’ online using the registration number of an identical car, often found through car ads, then fit the plates onto a stolen car. The police then believe that these cars are then used for various criminal activities such as robbery or drug-dealing. Industry sources say that more needs to be done. There is no identification on number plates to show where they were made nor are plates, once fitted, tamper proof.
Two things that the industry has been pushing for. Chief Constable, Charlie Hall of the National Police Chiefs Council said that some of the increase could be explained as a result of increased plate recognition cameras now able to auto issue fixed penalty fines and the owner of the cloned car being alerted that his car has been cloned when a parking or speeding ticket is issued in an area he didn’t visit.
The problem is that the courts and authorities assume that you committed the offence and it’s down to you to prove otherwise, for many a very stressful experience, especially if the case has reached a court. The advice from Auto Express to protect yourself when buying a used car that could be cloned is:
When buying a second-hand car use a dealer who is responsible for all background checks. If buying privately visit the seller’s house and never carry out a transaction in a layby or car park.
If the car is being sold well below market value be very suspicious.
Make sure that you compare the car’s Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) that can be found at the base of a car’s windscreen or inside a door jamb with the number shown in the V5C and any other supporting documentation
Never share copies of your V5C logbook online or give out the 11 or 12 digit Document Reference Number contained on the V5C
If you receive a parking or speeding ticket – or any other fixed penalty notice and you believe that your car has been cloned, immediately contact the issuing authority, the police and the DVLA, making sure that you document everything in writing.
Happy driving! By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Speed Limiters To Be Fitted As Standard On All New Cars

Friday, 5. April 2019

All new cars sold in the UK from 2022 will have speed limiters fitted as standard. The Department for Transport (DfT) has announced that it will follow the ruling from the European Commission on safety technology regardless of whether we are inside or outside of the EU at the time.
The limiters, called Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) were announced in March and have now been approved by the EU. ISA systems, or as I refer to them, Big Brother uses traffic sign recognition, cameras and/or GPS information to limit the speed of the car in a particular area by reducing the engine power and adjusting the speed if the driver doesn’t do it voluntarily.
TV reports suggested that the driver could override the limiter and motoring organisations suggested that this was needed in cases of emergency where a swift boost of power could avoid an accident and I agree but looking at the ruling more closely – yes the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) recommends a full On/Off switch to allow drivers to override the limiter they actually went on to say,’to aid public acceptance at introduction’, which suggests this is only a temporary measure before being fixed and unable to be switched off.
However, there is also a suggestion that drivers will still be able to override the limiter by pressing hard on the accelerator although the limiter will be switched on every time we start the car. It also seems that there is a difference of opinion between the DfT and the ETSC because in a briefing released by the DfT it said that it saw this change to be a ‘step change in Road Safety’.
However, the DfT said that it expected the limiters ‘to give drivers feedback when the speed limit is exceeded rather than limiting the car’s speed’. The ETSC advises, ‘If the driver does not apply the brakes (when entering a lower limit), the vehicle would, in any case, slow down naturally to the new speed limit by reducing engine power’. Confused or what? I guess this will happen a lot when we take over our own lawmaking.
All new models given type approval from May 2022 onwards must have these systems while cars on the market by that date must have them by May 2024 – no I don’t either but that’s the wording. So given what the DfT has said I’m still none the wiser as to what will happen. Limiters that advise the speed limit or limiters that slow you down? By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Top 5 Most Common Causes Of Road Accidents

Friday, 15. March 2019

Business Car magazine has identified the top 5 causes of road accidents attributed to vehicle defects. Their investigation revealed the following:

 

Brakes                                     37%

Tyres                                       30%

Steering or Suspension            17%

Lights or Indicators                  9%

Vehicle Or Trailer Overload     7%

So there you have it, make sure that you take care of the above or risk an accident. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Is Our Consumer Credit Legislation Fit For Purpose – I Think Not!

Wednesday, 23. January 2019

This year I’m on a campaign to change our consumer credit laws, especially in the areas of motor finance. We have two products that account for the vast majority of new car finance, contract hire and Personal Contract Purchase (PCP). Contract hire accounts for about 85% of company acquisitions whilst Personal Contract Hire (PCH) is now starting to take market share away from PCP which has recently dropped from 85% of consumer new car registrations to 80% in 2018.
However, PCP is now being used by more people to finance used cars, estimated to increase the number of live PCP contracts to around 5 million. The point is that we have two major finance products that are fudged in legal terms. Legally there are no such products as PCP or PCH even though they represent the largest number of agreements.
Take out a Hire Purchase agreement or personal loan agreement and you are pretty much covered for all eventualities by the UK laws that govern them. But take out a PCP or PCH and you are referred to the Consumer Credit Act which was never set up with Contract Hire or Contact Purchase in mind. This means that the providers can pretty much include any terms they like into the contract without fear that they are breaking any laws.
 
Look at the top of a PCP agreement and it will show it as a Hire Purchase Agreement – which it isn’t, it’s a Hire Purchase agreement with a load of conditions. The same with PCH, it will show it on the documents as a Hire Agreement Regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974, at a time when PCH didn’t exist. So each finance providers cave pretty much free reign to include any terms and conditions the see fit to include. 
 
Two examples of confusing situations come to mind which cause all sorts of problems with consumers. The first is one that relates to PCP and what is known as Voluntary Termination (VT) which is the ability under clauses 99 and 100 of the Consumer Credit Act to hand your car back once you have paid 50% of the total owed.
The problem here is that the lenders don’t like it because it can lead to losses, especially if the car has covered very high mileage. As an example say you VT’d the car after 2 years of a three year contract. Your contract mileage was 10,000 per annum so you should have only covered 20,000 after 2 years but let’s say you covered 28,000 miles. Your excess mileage is 10 pence per mile so you should be charged a pro-rata excess mileage figure of 8,000 miles at  say 10 pence + VAT = £960.
 
This is the argument put forward by lenders. In fact this is incorrect and flies in the face of the Consumer Credit Act that was created before such things as excess mileage. So the law states that you can hand the car back to the lender irrespective of the mileage. However, when Renault pushed for payment from a customer and the Financial Ombudsman Service got involved they found in favour of Renault. It would be so easy to include a few changes to current legislation or introduce new legislation that dealt with PCP and set down a rule. It would save lots of confusion.
 
The issue that comes to mind with PCH is the extension of contracts. Every leasing company that allows for an extension (not all do) have a different way of calculating the lease extension rentals, which is wrong. There should be a standard method to remove confusion and make the extension transparent. I have a case against Mercedes Benz who increased my monthly payments by 20% for an extension even though my mileage was running at much less than my contracted mileage. Laws should make life less complicated – not more!
 
If you support my objectives please sign up or follow me on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn by following my links.
 
 
Facebook: @grahamhilltraining
 
LinkedIn : Search for Graham Hill

https://instagram.com/grahamhill999/

By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Some Notable Things Happened In 2018 – The Industry Review

Friday, 11. January 2019

£500 Overspend On Petrol: Drivers can spend £500 per annum more than necessary depending on where they fill up.

Daily Insurance Claims Hit £33m Per Day: Car insurance payouts ran at £33m every day in 2016 whilst premiums hit a record high.

1.4 Million Drivers Attended Re-Training Courses: Drivers who were caught committing motoring offences attended courses raising £54 million for the police in the process

9,050 Drink Drive Casualties: The highest on record since 2012 with 2016 7% higher than 2015.

Council Parking Revenue Up To £1.58 Bn In 2017: New figures revealed that this produced a surplus of £819 million.

1,024 Children Banned From Driving: Even though they weren’t old enough to drive

39% Drop In Phone Penalties: Motorists caught using a mobile phone whilst driving dropped from 49,694 in 2016 to 30,470 in 2017. This was put down to fines and points doubling. Or maybe it’s down to fewer police and hands-free fitted to more cars.

109 Driving Instructor Investigations: The DVSA cracked down on inappropriate relations between driving instructors and students.

Superfluous Road Signs: 4.3 million road signs were shown by the Department for Transport to be superfluous.

15% Of Motorists Report Being Blinded By Headlights: According to research carried out by the RAC

The Average Fine For Car Theft Was £198: With 80% of crooks receiving a fine rather than a jail sentence.

The Average Age Of Cars On UK Roads Is 8.1 Years: The Department for Transport revealed that the average age increased from 7.8 years in 2015 and 6.8 years in 2003.

8,000 Crooked Car Washes: The CarWash Advisory Service estimated that 8,000 of the 20,000 hand car washes are involved in illegal activities.

5.65 Million Parking Tickets Handed Out In 2017: The Government has pledged to clamp down on private firms.

Pothole Claims Run At £1million Per Month: The AA revealed the scale of the claims.

89,000 Vehicles Stolen In 2017: Vehicle theft went up from 56,000 in 2016 to 89,000 in 2017. Blamed on police cuts and thieves managing to crack keyless technology.

80% Of New Cars Were Bought On Finance: According to Auto Express I gave tips on PCP deals along with revelations. An influencer!

London Reduced Speed Limit: Sadiq Khan said that all roads managed by Transport for London would have a 20mph speed limit

Drivers Overspend £3.4bn On Repairs: Green Flag indicates that drivers spend £3.4bn more than they need to.

20% Reduced Reaction Times: University of Bath reported this drop in reaction time as a result of a hangover.

£106 million Government Investment In EV’s: This investment in vehicle and battery development was matched by £500 million investment from industry.

27% Of Those Killed On Our Roads Were Not Wearing Seatbelts: 1,793 people lost their lives on the roads in 2017, 27% were found not to be wearing seatbelts.

Audi Fined £700m For False Emission Figures: German authorities imposed the fine on Audi for ‘deviations from regulatory requirements’ over V6 & V8 diesel engine emissions.

Diesel MOT Failures Hit 238,871: Following new MOT rules – a fourfold increase.

2.3 Million Cars Clocked: One in 16 cars display a false mileage reading with the Local Government Association calling for the ban of mileage correction devices.

So there you have it – some of the major issues and statistics of 2018. What will 2019 bring us – well we will find out soon enough! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Mobile Phone & Speeding Offences Dropping

Wednesday, 24. October 2018

According to car warranty providers Warranty Direct mobile phone and speeding offences are decreasing. They have found out that using a mobile phone whilst driving offences have dropped by 44% and speeding offences have dropped by 8.5%. They came to this conclusion after analysing data from the Ministry of Justice over the last 5 years.

 

They put this drop down to increases in fines and penalties introduced in March last year. Really?? Their analysis showed that each time penalties or fines have been increased this has been followed by a drop in prosecutions. Last March not only saw fines increase, the penalty points awarded if you were caught using a mobile phone behind the wheel also increased from 3 points to 6 points.

 

The CEO of Warranty Direct, Simon Ackers, said to What Car, ‘It’s great to see these updated driving laws have had a significant, positive impact on driving behaviour in such a short space of time’. ‘I don’t believe it’s just the increased financial penalties, either; motoring authorities have increased their efforts to raise awareness of the dangers of unsafe driving’.

 

According to road safety website, Think, you’re 4 times more likely to be in a crash if you’re using a mobile phone whilst driving. OK, I don’t have a problem with the above but could some of the drop in prosecutions possibly be down to the drop in the numbers of police out and about able to catch those breaking the law?

 

In Sussex, where I live, you can go days without seeing a police car and I don’t think they have a local plod. Speed cameras were switched off years ago and even little hidey holes that mobile speed detectors used to hide away in to catch you speeding are no longer used. So it’s great that offences are down but is it because fewer people are breaking the law. I personally don’t think so. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Campaign Launched To Tackle Tailgaters

Saturday, 29. September 2018

Highways England has produced a report showing that tailgating kills or seriously injures 100 people on the road every year and causes one in eight road casualties. Highways England is the Government-owned company responsible for the UK’s 4,300 miles of motorways and major trunk roads – they produced the statistics from their own research.

 

They found that 90% of drivers surveyed reported that they had been tailgated or witnessed another driver being tailgated. As a result, they have launched a campaign called ‘Don’t be a space invader’ to help dissuade motorists from the practice. No I don’t get it either. They also found that tailgating was the single largest concern drivers have about other road users.

 

Ex F1 champion, Nigel Mansell is backing the campaign. He branded tailgating as ‘A driving habit I utterly deplore’, then said that driving too close to the car ahead is, ‘aggressive and intimidating’ and ‘Can lead to a crash with a tragic outcome’. Matthew Avery of Thatcham research agreed and explained, tailgating can lead to a ‘ripple effect’ of sharp braking from other drivers which can cause ‘Phantom’, traffic jams.

 

Richard Leonard, head of road safety at Highways England, says tailgating is dangerous, not only because it gives the perpetrator no thinking, braking or reacting time. But also it is ‘Intimidating and frightening if you’re on the receiving end’. This mix of circumstances can lead to mistakes being made with serious consequences.

 

In addition to the possibility of an accident, tailgating can lead to you receiving a fine of £100 and 3 points on your driving licence for dangerous driving. The official advice is to allow 2 seconds between you and the car in front and increase that to 4 seconds in the wet. Drive safely and think of others. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks