The Best Car Finance Blog In The World

New mobile phone detection warning signs are being rolled out by Thames Valley and Hampshire police forces.

The system, developed by Westcotec, comprises a sensor capable of detecting vehicles where there are active 2G, 3G and 4G phone signals, and an LED warning sign located a short distance along the road.

As long as the activation meets certain pre-determined parameters, the sensor will pick up that a driver is using a phone for calling, text or data purposes and will activate the warning sign. This shows an illuminated mobile phone icon within a bright red circle and diagonal red line.

The device is purely about education, warning drivers and being able to identify when the driver was on the phone. It is the first such system to have a direct interaction with a mobile phone offender.

The technology can detect if a driver is using Bluetooth, and will therefore not trigger the warning sign. However, the manufacturer accepts that some activations might be triggered by non-driving occupants.

Norfolk County Council was the first to trial the road signs last year, but this is the first time that the police has decided to deploy the technology.

The forces say the two detectors, which cost £6,000 each, will be located on the A34 in Oxfordshire but will be posted at different locations throughout the Thames Valley and Hampshire to start – but more could be rolled out.

Matt Barber, deputy police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, told the BBC that the system was “not fool-proof”, but said that the police needed to “make it as socially unacceptable to use your mobile whilst driving as it is to drink and drive”.

PC Liz Johnson, a roads safety officer, said research suggested a driver was four times more likely to crash if they were using a phone and twice as likely to be involved in a fatal collision when texting compared with drink-driving.

“It is vital that people take notice and stop using their mobile phones whilst driving,” she added.

Drivers caught using a mobile phone while driving are currently fined £200 and given six points on their licence. By Graham Hill

According to Cap HPI the maintenance costs for Electric Vehicles (EV’s) are 23% cheaper than for the equivalent petrol model. Calculations were based on 3 year, 60,000 mile running periods. The gap is greater for smaller vehicles.

An electric Renault Zoe was found to cost £1,100 to maintain compared to £1,497 for a similar petrol driven Vauxhall Corsa. Representing a 35.7% saving. While the best selling UK electric vehicle, the Nissan Leaf cost £1,197 to maintain compared to £1,429 for a petrol VW Golf – 19% cheaper.

Cap HPI senior valuations expert, Chris Plumb commented: ‘An electric car motor has far fewer moving parts than a petrol or diesel engine. They also benefit from gentler driving styles that lead to lower wear and tear of brakes and tyres’.

He went on to say, ‘While the purchase price is often higher at the moment- but coming down all the time – drivers will find an EV much cheaper to run with significantly lower costs to charge than visiting a pump as well as the lower maintenance costs’.

I would add a caveat to that as I carried out an exercise last year and found that if you used a fast charger located in motorway service stations the cost per mile, based on the electric car’s true range, compared with petrol or diesel cars was significantly higher. Of course, this dropped heavily if slow charged from your domestic supply. By Graham Hill

Business Car magazine has identified the top 5 causes of road accidents attributed to vehicle defects. Their investigation revealed the following:

Brakes                                     37%

Tyres                                       30%

Steering or Suspension            17%

Lights or Indicators                  9%

Vehicle Or Trailer Overload     7%

So there you have it, make sure that you take care of the above or risk an accident. By Graham Hill

The cars on our roads that cover highest mileage have always tended to be company cars. They are nearly always new and are subject to some very stringent controls, imposed upon the drivers by the employers. As a result our roads tend to be much safer as the cars are properly maintained.

However, since the real world (WLTP) emissions tests that were carried out last year we have seen an increase in declared CO2 emissions across most makes and models of cars. This meant that drivers suddenly saw increases in BIK tax whilst driving identical replacement cars. The Government promised to address the problem and make adjustments to bandings so that drivers didn’t suffer.

Sadly that hasn’t happened so we are seeing a move by drivers away from company cars towards car allowance with many of these drivers preferring to drive higher powered 2^nd hand prestige cars than say 1.0L Mondeos. This has meant that companies no longer have the tight controls over the service and maintenance of cars used by their drivers.

The employers are still responsible but as they no longer have the same level of control, servicing may not be in line with manufacturers recommendations and when employees realise the cost of maintaining prestige used cars maintenance may drop off making cars less safe.

The Government has replied to complaints by the industry that they have broken a promise by saying that the increase in BIK tax will encourage drivers and companies to run lower emission cars. But as we are seeing the drivers are pushing employers to move to car allowances which can lead to less safe roads and by taking used prestige cars the environment will also suffer.

According to Fleet News the rate of employees opting out of company cars for cash is ‘at the highest we’ve seen’. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. By Graham Hill

Auto Express has managed to find out that police and council ANPR cameras take 10 billion images each year generating 203 million hits on ‘vehicles of interest’. Police cameras are used to detect and track criminals whilst the council cameras are used to detect parking and road infractions.

This means that the local councils in England, Scotland and Wales have used their cameras to generate £472 million in local authority fines over the last 5 years using motorists to boost their struggling bank accounts. Given the continued strain on budgets, local councils will no doubt use this cash cow opportunity so you should be very wary that even though you may not see a policeman or traffic warden big brother will know if you break the law.

When ANPR cameras were introduced their intention was to assist the police in law enforcement but they have since been extended for the use of councils to generate income. Action group, Big Brother Watch explain, this is ‘constant monitoring of innocent motorists’, with no clear legal basis. Tony Porter, the Government’s surveillance camera commissioner warned that the UK’s ANPR network operates with ‘limited democratic oversite’. He also feels that the network ‘must surely be one of the largest data gatherers of its citizens in the world’.

That doesn’t create a problem if the cameras are used to fight crime but concerns exist over the number of images retained and the use they are put to beyond crime fighting. The most active police cameras are in the West Midlands with nearly 900 million scans each year with 24 million hits on vehicles of interest. Bottom of the top 10 is Dyfed-Powys with 414 million scans with 10.5 million hits on vehicles of interest.

The London Borough of Barnet collected around £38.3 million in fines by issuing 347,000 tickets as a result of ANPR imaging. Glasgow was next with 567,000 tickets raising £33.9 million in fines. London seems to be most popular with 6 of the top 10 ANPR-generated council fines over the last 5 years being in London boroughs.

And things will potentially get worse as the cost of the cameras has dropped dramatically. You can even buy them on eBay for around £200. I would suggest that the current figure of 8,768 cameras installed nationally will grow substantially over the next few years.

It is also my belief that as the Government starts to lose revenue as a result of drivers moving across to hybrid and electric, resulting in a drop in petrol and diesel tax income, they will then charge for road use which will make ANPR essential for charging and proof that cars have entered a charge zone. Time will tell. By Graham Hill