Which Cities Are Worst For CO2 Emissions?

Saturday, 27. December 2014

When people move house they tend to look for certain things in the area into which they are planning to move. Ease of access, closeness to schools with high teaching standards, where the shops are, likelihood of flooding etc. etc. But it is felt that a new credential is starting to surface, as a result of which those crazy girls and boys at Confused.com have carried out a survey in order to help.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

What is this new credential? Obviously it is the greenness of your nearest town or city. What they did was look at every car  registered to an area and calculated the average CO2 emissions figure.

Now I have to say girls and boys this isn’t the most scientific way of arriving at the greenest and dirtiest towns and cities across the land but it is a start and must have nicely filled a few otherwise boring days with something productive and incredibly useful (better than sitting in front of your PC’s playing Candy Crush – just).

In terms of cities, and according to Confused.com, London is the worst of all for CO2 emissions, followed by St Albans (is that a city?) then Brighton & Hove. This is what Gemma Stanbury, head of motor at Confused.com, had to say, ‘With so many Brits relying on their cars for work and other commitments, it’s unrealistic to think that people will be able to do without their cars.

But it’s encouraging to see that many drivers are making an effort to become greener.’ Are they? I have to say Gemma that I don’t have many clients that make their final decision based on the car’s CO2 unless they are looking at the benefit in kind implications which is more of a financial decision rather than a ‘save their local environment’ decision.

In case you are at all interested here are the vitally important stats in the event you are considering a move in the near future:

Town Emissions Per Car

CO2 g/km

Peterborough 142.03
Portsmouth 146.69
Stirling 147.38
Worcester 150.21
Glasgow 150.35
Birmingham 150.58
Durham 151.36
Sunderland 153.10
Exeter 153043
Gloucester 154.08
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Motorists’ Priorities For The 2015 Election

Saturday, 20. December 2014

UKIP’s Nigel Farage may believe that he is onto a winner by fighting the general election on immigration policy, Labour think the same about the Health Service and Cameron on the Economy whilst Nick Clegg will no doubt fight on the first thing that comes to mind!

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

But according to a latest survey they are all off beam. It seems that when Auto Express polled over 1,000 drivers they felt the most important two things that had to be addressed by the various parties, vying for your vote, were reduced fuel prices (55%) and increased speed limits (9%).

It’s true, if any of the parties are to succeed in their efforts to entice motorist voters, they should have clear policies on the aforementioned. Unfortunately, when Auto Express contacted the 4 main parties none had a specific policy for addressing these vote winning issues. For a long time now Governments have attempted to entice people onto public transport but with few exceptions they have generally failed.

We still love our cars and for many the car is essential in order to get to work or get the kids to school. So whichever party can solve the problem of continually spiralling motoring costs and added taxes to make motoring more affordable would certainly notice a swing in their favour (ooer missus). In the words of Andy Sylvester of the Tax Payers Alliance, ‘…it’s not acceptable for the Treasury to use people picking up their children or heading to work as cash cows.’

It did not surprise the Auto Express that drivers would want lower fuel costs but it came as a bit of a surprise to see that drivers wanted speed limits on certain roads increased. What do you think? Answers on a post card to Nigel Farage. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Graham Hill’s Bits & Pices

Thursday, 18. December 2014

Bits & Pieces: Halfords Autocentres found in a survey that a third of motorists believed that kicking tyres was sufficient to check whether tyres were safely inflated. Men are more likely to use this test (42%) compared to women (30%). Are they nuts or what?

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

Have you ever wondered how drivers of fighter jets keep their windscreens clear? No, nor me but it may be that the technology used on jets could replace windscreen wipers. They use frequency waves to keep the windscreen clear and this technology is being developed by McLaren and could ultimately find its way onto production cars. Especially when it was revealed that this technology could be mass produced for as little as £10 per car. Congestion is costing drivers a fortune according to traffic information company Inrix and the Centre for Economics and Business Research. Gridlock in the UK is costing households £4.4 billion each year with London accounting for £2 billion. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Leasing A New Car That May Not Be Latest Model

Saturday, 25. October 2014

If I was to sell you my used Vauxhall Astra and it had a badge on the back that suggested that it was a top of the range Elite when in fact it was an entry level Exclusiv, there wouldn’t be much you could do about it unless I had advertised it as a fully spec’d Elite. The same would apply if the car I was selling was a 2010 car but was 2009 model year spec. Exclusiv.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

The fact is that you can inspect the car and see that the car doesn’t have leather seats, electric rear windows or fog lights that were fitted on an Elite as standard when the car was new or the addition of fog lights and sat nav when the car changed from 2009 to 2010. You see exactly what you are getting so the basic rule of Caveat Emptor – buyer beware prevails.

Of course this isn’t the case with a new car that you don’t get to see before you buy it or lease it. With some cars changing model spec at least once if not twice every year you may not receive what you thought you had ordered. Especially as manufacturers will throw a few thousand pounds across the bonnet (that’s dealer speak for bonus) of the outgoing model in order to sell them quickly to make way for the new model coming out.

Whilst this represents great value for money (we currently have deals on top of the range outgoing Focus models) you may not be told that the cars on offer are not the new model cars. Some may be pre-registered whilst others may just be stockpiled so whilst I would be suspicious if the cars are pre-registered, suggesting old model cars, that may not be the case if they are unregistered.

If unregistered you might assume that the car you will receive will be the car advertised on the manufacturer’s web site with at best a different spec. at worst a completely new shape. Manufacturers will also advertise a new model maybe 2 months in advance of launch, again fooling you into thinking that the car you just ordered is the new model. So always check with the supplier that the car you have ordered is the car you want? Don’t simply be tempted by a cheap rate. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Government Finally Practices What It Preaches

Friday, 24. October 2014

Years ago I was group general manager for a reasonable sized PLC. I was responsible for a large number of departments including IT, general admin, cost and management accounting,  personnel (known as HR these days), health and safety and much more including our fleet department responsible for over 700 vehicles.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

At the time Peugeot had introduced some major new development in the area of diesel cars, in the past diesels were mainly fitted into vans and trucks. They were still a bit noisy, lacked a bit of low end power, especially the non turbo versions – 0-60 in a week and a half and filling up with diesel meant you stank of the stuff until it wore off 5 days later!

But being a Cost and Management Accountant I crunched the figures and decided that company cars should all be diesel, except the main board of directors and me! The staff kicked off, as did their managers and directors, but I was having none of it. The figures didn’t lie so the drivers had diesel imposed upon them, after all when is a company ever run as a democracy – good grief!

Constantly I would hear the argument that I should be driving a diesel and I would use every reason under the sun until it came down to the fact that I simply didn’t want to. Now I was reminded of this situation when I read that the Government have finally agreed to include 150 electric vehicles in their fleet of cars used to ferry ministers around. The £5 million scheme is expected to extend to councils, the police force and the NHS.

Considering the government has been pushing EV’s for 5 years why has it taken so long to lead the way? I could understand if this was in the 70’s and the government was a company but they are a democracy for goodness sake! With this new initiative led by the Government to push more of us into EV’s, will I be changing my car next year for an electric car? The hell I will, only just started driving diesels! Have a word! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

New Accident Alert Systems To Be Fitted In All New Cars.

Thursday, 23. October 2014

After watching the accidents that appeared in the Japanese Grand Prix last weekend it not only brought into focus the very high level of safety now in F1 cars but also the fact that even the precautions fitted to the cars can’t allow for the very infrequent freak accident that happened to Jules Bianchi, our thoughts and prayers are with him and his family.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

Much of the F1 technology has been transferred across to normal road cars, from tyres to brakes and traction control. Fatalities on UK roads are dropping, as is the seriousness of the injuries received by those caught up in the accidents. Volvo, known for their very high safety standards, have stated that by 2020 no one will be killed or seriously injured in their cars.

But having said that the EU believes there is more to be done across the board and has set targets for the introduction of automatic systems into all new type-approved cars that will automatically alert the emergency services should the car be involved in an accident along with a locator that will advise the emergency services the exact location of the vehicle.

The plan was to make this statutory from the start of 2015 but the car industry said it needed at least 3 years to test and implement such a scheme. They also need to decide upon an acceptable method of advising the emergency services across Europe. Some prestige cars already have an emergency system fitted into the car but it requires someone to activate it which then dials into the manufacturers own call centre who then has to do something to alert the emergency services.

Some have suggested the use of mobile phones but they are not too accurate when pinpointing location and an automatic alert app. would need to sense when the phone flies across a car in an accident. eCall is a device proposed by the EU in 2004 and is already being used by some manufacturers.

It is a box that detects an accident through sensors mounted in the car, calls the emergency services and pinpoints the location but the system still needs refinement and certainly won’t be ready for the launch date proposed by the EU, now moved back to October 2015. According to Volvo’s own system, On Call’s, product manager, Michael L Sena the industry would need a further 3 years before every new car was fitted with such a device. He also saw problems with setting up the infrastructure across Europe for the same device to work in every EU country.

It was a massive task and not one that could be completed in less than a year. He also pointed out the legal implications around data protection, human rights etc. many drivers would not be happy with someone somewhere knowing of their every move and being able to track them, something I touched on recently in one of my blogs.

The argument to that is that the system doesn’t track you, it only activates in the event of an accident. It is likely to happen though, as earlier in the year the EU voted for ‘the deployment of the necessary infrastructure’ to accommodate the new eCall system across Europe. So it should now be under way. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Which Manufacturers Are Meeting The EU Emissions Targets?

Wednesday, 22. October 2014

I am often asked why manufacturers have included things like stop/start technology and are hell bent on reducing engine sizes to that fitted to a 1960’s moped? Are they all becoming amazingly environmentally responsible? Well I’m sure some manufacturers would argue that they are becoming more responsible and are concerned about the environment but I would suspect that it is more to do with cash!

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

Or more important fines that will be imposed by the EU if the manufacturers don’t meet CO2 emission targets. And they won’t be pussy footing about, they are set to impose fines of millions of Euros so it is important that the manufacturers tow the line. But how is the ‘average’ CO2 being calculated?

It isn’t as simple as one would think? The obvious suggestion is to take the total cars sold x their individual CO2 output then divided back by the number of cars sold. If you thought this, you would be wrong because it would be unfair on manufacturers of prestige cars compared to those who make predominantly small cars.

The answer was to build in each car’s weight into the equation. As a result Business Car applied the rules to the top 20 manufacturers to see who was producing the greenest cars and which manufacturers were meeting the CO2 targets for their range. Surprisingly no manufacturers were on target but they listed the top manufacturers as follows with their achievement compared to target:

Rank Manufacturer % of Target
1 Renault 94
2 Peugeot 86
3 Volkswagen 84
4 Volvo 74
5 Toyota 70
6= Citroen 64
6= Ford 64
8 Seat 62
9 Audi 58
10 Mercedes 56
11= Skoda 52
11= Vauxhall 52
13 Nissan 50
14= BMW 48
14= Kia 48
16= Fiat 40
16= Honda 40
18 Hyundai 38
19 Mini 36
20 Land Rover 24

By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Graham Hill Challenges The FCA Over Sub Prime Lending

Wednesday, 22. October 2014

Many years ago I was fortunate enough to have created a fairly substantial asset/vehicle finance brokerage. I had seven offices with a pretty heady turnover but like many entrepreneurs I made a couple of poor judgments and in 1991 I lost the lot. The business, my house and the missus all departed.
Luckily for me I had the good fortune of attending a Dale Carnegie course many years earlier (in fact after a few courses as a graduate assistant I was invited to train as an instructor – which I did for a year until my day job and the added demands following the birth of number 2 son caused me to stop). The good news was that I handled my predicament really well but for the first time in my life I was forced to enter a world that I had never experienced before.
That of Social Security, or as was known then – the dole! My mortgage was £1,250 per month and in order for me to claim part of that from my insurance I had to sign on. I had to stand in the queue to receive my few pounds each fortnight (I think). Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t come from a privileged background. My parents weren’t wealthy but my dad was never out of work and we survived.
But I had never experienced poverty or desperation, until I had to join the dole queue. Not one person I spoke to in the many hours I stood in the queues were lazy, trying to find ways not to work. Some had part time jobs working the maximum hours for a pittance just to be able to add a little to their meager dole payout. I heard stories of sadness and despair that made me feel fortunate that all I’d done is lose my business.
At the same time I heard disturbing stories about moneylenders who would charge crazy rates to those wishing to borrow a few pounds for just a few days till they were paid or received their next dole payout. I also heard about the ways the moneylenders would collect their money. It was a disgrace and frightening. And something, thank God, I never had to experience.
Move on a few years and quite innocently I was working with a jolly group of car traders in Brighton. If they had a client that needed finance we would arrange it for them. I knew that the traders had their fingers in a few pies. They were property developers and some even ‘made a book’ at horse racing meetings. But what I experienced one day was to stay with me to this day. I arranged to meet one of the traders in a pub to pick up a couple of invoices for cars I had financed.
When I walked into the not too pleasant pub it was as though he was holding court. There were men and women standing around outside the pub. When I walked in I could hear a woman pleading to borrow £30 till the same time next week. He gave her £30 but said it would cost her £50 the following week and as she walked away he said something along the lines of ‘Don’t forget to get the money to me next week, you don’t want me to come round to collect it do you?’
Everyone was dismissed as I walked in, I collected the invoices, declined a drink and walked out. As I walked out I heard the trader shouting at a man, clearly struggling with life, telling him that he missed his payment by two days and the debt had now doubled. The man was crying.
They were the last two deals I ever did with this group of, what I thought were, affable old school car traders. The pub no longer exists and the trader himself died many years ago.
As I drove away in my Jaguar I felt for those people. It broke my heart to think that they were being totally exploited by thugs and bully boys just so that they could buy some food or clothe their kids. So why am I revealing this shady activity? Because yesterday I heard the great news that the FCA had managed to put the squeeze on Wonga, a legitimate lender to those in need, so much so that they have just written off £220 million pounds owed by 330,000 customers because they didn’t carry out sufficient affordability tests. Now don’t get me wrong,
I am not a big fan of payday lenders but they are massively better than the alternatives as I have witnessed first hand. Several smaller payday lenders have already gone with little chance of recovering the millions of pounds owed to them. Of course there needs to be checks and measures in place and preventative measures to stop ordinary people who are suffering hard times from falling further in debt.
Whilst the FCA are happily patting themselves on the back I ask what will happen to those desperate to pay for some electricity on their key or food for their children? Will we see the return of the no questions asked, unauthorised, moneylenders? Many of the 330,000 Wonga borrowers I’m sure are responsible people that are simply struggling but with this windfall comes a downside. No doubt this will show up as a default on their credit file stopping them from borrowing for the next 6 years whilst that remains on their file.
One woman who was about to have her £600 loan from Wonga written off complained that they should never have loaned her the money in the first place as she already had several other loans. Can you believe that, Wonga had created the problem by not checking her status carefully enough? Has the world gone mad! But as a result of these sorts of people many legitimate borrowers will no longer be able to take out a payday loan to ‘tide them over.’ And what about the other lenders from whom she received money, has a precident been set? Could she refuse to repay those loans? But it gets worse.
Given my passionate feelings towards the FCA and their ridiculous and mainly unnecessary rules being applied to all lenders (not just payday lenders), it was not a good day for a senior FCA representative to be giving a talk at an International Vehicle Finance Conference with me not only in attendance but sitting on the front row – as I usually do – last Friday. The off pat presentation explained all the new rules regulations and tests that lenders must now introduce.
I first pointed out that whilst there may have been a problem with payday lenders the same problem doesn’t exist in vehicle finance. It aint broke so why are you tryng to fix it? After he had pointed out that the new rules had become effective from April I asked why sub-prime lenders were still trading? These are the lenders who lend at 45% APR and beyond to those with financial problems enabling them to drive a car having been turned down by their bank or other prime lender.
‘How do you square your tight affordability tests that MUST be applied to all loans with the existence of sub-prime lenders?’ ‘Surely if an applicant fails with a prime rate lender offering 6.9%APR how can the same customer still get a loan from a sub prime lender at 45% APR, it doesn’t make sense?’ I went on to ask. He answered by saying that the regulations were still being worked on. I pressed him further by reminding him that the new rules were effective from April.
I then pointed out that the new department, which I read is costing £400 million PA, is creating a massive void of people unable to get finance. I asked what they were doing to redress this potentially massive problem? What is to happen to all those now being dumped by the prime lenders, where are they to go? People that have been ill or made redundant now need to get to their place of work or new job and need a car. He couldn’t answer me. And what of the economy?
I pointed out that the FCA rules could result in one of three situations. Applicants could be told that whilst they had only applied to borrow £5,000 their credit is so strong they could afford to borrow £10,000. We all know that won’t happen. Situation 2 we retain the status quo, the applicants will still borrow as they did in the past. In which case why are we spending £400 million on an unnecessary department? Or, as we all suspect, many more people will fail and not be able to borrow the money.
What will that do to the economy? Could we suddenly slide back into recession. The FCA representative scooted out of the meeting quicker than you can move a Wonga slider without an answer. If this concerns you and you feel we should start up a LinkedIn group please write to me or am I alone on this one? By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Tax Changes That Could Benefit Scottish Drivers

Tuesday, 21. October 2014

Whilst the Scots finally decided to stick with the rest of the UK we are now left wandering at what cost? Like many things that the Tories have done since coming into power with the Lib Dems the whole thing was poorly thought through and panic took over at the thought of losing our good chums north of the border.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

Like most I’m pleased that we haven’t lost Scotland, at least we stand a chance at the next Olympics but what have we had to agree to behind closed doors? There was an expression that was bandied about as the whole of the UK Government joined forces to try to convince the Scots that we were ‘Better together’, if Scotland decided to stay in they would be given ‘tax raising powers and further fiscal devolution.’

I heard that said by all parties and even agreed to by Gordon Brown, not sure what authority he had to agree to that on behalf of the UK government but anyway, he did. The problem is that the expression is so glib it passed most of us by but like free tuition fees in Scotland but not in the rest of the UK what is this likely to mean?

Whilst many believed that they could chuck an extra few pence on fuel and booze (except whiskey of course), and maybe increase tax on some of the petrol companies who are busy emptying the big (or possibly small) pools of oil under the North Sea to enable them to give every Scottish kid an iPhone we were fairly disinterested. But should we have been?

There is already talk of income tax rates that could vary by up to 15% compared to the rest of the UK. OK you may think, that is just one area of tax and not that important to the rest of us. After all road tax, NI and capital allowances were supposedly not on the table but a tax expert and good friend of mine, Alistair Kendrick, pointed out that if the Scottish Parliament starts messing about with tax rates and bandings it could affect the Scots and the amount of benefit in kind (BIK) tax they pay on their company cars.

And this is just one likely change, God knows what else is likely to come out as we fully appreciate the cost of consequential damage following increased devolution. What was Cameron saying – ‘We’re all in it together’ Hmmm interesting times ahead. It won’t be long before we all troop up to Scotland to buy our cars, have them serviced, MOT’d and fill them up with fuel. Watch this space! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Rail Cost More Expensive Than Car Cost

Thursday, 25. September 2014

You may or may not know that taxi fares are calculated (automatically via software in the metre) using a mixture of time and distance. For example, the cabs in London travelling between 06.00 and 22.00 on a normal weekday (excluding bank holidays) charge according to Tariff 1. For the first 252.4 metres or the first 27.1 seconds (whichever is reached first) there is a minimum charge of £2.40.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

For each additional 126.2 metres or 27.1 seconds (whichever is reached first), or part thereof, if the fare is less than £17.40 then there is a charge of 20p. Once the charge has reached £17.40 the charge increases to 20p per 88.5 metres or 19 seconds (whichever is reached first), or part thereof.

As it’s easier to calculate the cost per mile than per hour (we don’t know the speed the cab will travel at) the rate goes from £15.30 per mile to £2.55 per mile after the minimum charge then it increases again to £3.64 per mile once the charge reaches £17.40. All very complicated but converting into a cost per mile provides us with a better perspective.

So I was quite surprised to read a totally different perspective on rail fares following the last, above inflation, fare rise announcement. It was not only shocking but also gave us a very good reason why people are still not choosing to take public transport over their precious car. The report suggested that peak time rail fares are one of the worst value items, sitting alongside car insurance, inner city/airport parking, energy bills and car mechanics charged by some dealers at £200 per hour.

The columnist explained that his short, early morning trip cost an amazing £1.20 per minute travelled or £72 per hour. So comparing that with a black cab after the minimum charge of £2.40 you pay 20p per 27.1 seconds or £0.44 per minute or £26.40 per hour. Is it me and the columnist, Mike Rutherford, or is this madness? He calculated that those doing the 121 minute trip between Manchester and London during peak time costs them £1.33 per minute or £80 per hour.

He points out that it is just a matter of time before 2nd class peak travel will reach £100 per hour or £150 per hour first class. Apparently an annual season ticket between London and Manchester costs £14,000 which works out at £1.33 per minute. He then compared that with the cost of a new Mini which, after allowing for ALL running costs including the cost of the car, fuel, insurance, servicing, RFL, depreciation etc. it came in at 33p per minute if you assume an average 60mph.

Now this may be a little unrealistic but it puts rail travel into context. No wonder people still want to avoid train travel! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks