A BMW That Achieves 148 MPG!

Thursday, 25. February 2016

How do you fancy driving an executive car that achieves 148 miles to the gallon? Well you can with the new BMW 330e M Sport which we just happen to have on offer at the moment. It is BMW’s entrée into the Plug in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV).

Whilst the new tiered Government Grant scheme has dropped the grant from £5,000 to £2,500 it is still good value for money on a lease. You will need a means to re-charge the car from an electric charge point that can be installed in your garage (grants available) or via charging points now available at services on motorways, some hotels and on certain streets.

The electric motor starts you up and moves you off whilst the 2.0 petrol engine takes over to boost power or take over when the 87bhp electric engine starts to flag. In EV mode the car has a top speed of 80 mph but switch across to petrol and you increase the top speed to 140 mph. The car has all the usual refinement of a 330i but with all the economy of a hybrid, the general consensus is that the car is a definite winner leading the way for other hybrid cars across the BMW range.

Oh and another piece of breaking news, Transport Secretary, Patrick McLoughlin has announced plans to allow PHEV vehicles to have access to bus lanes in the eight Go Ultra Low cities across the UK as part of a £40 million investment plan in readiness for electric and hybrid vehicles. Some of the investment will be used to provide rapid charging hubs and plug in points at street lights. Time to make the move? If not we are certainly getting close. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Emissions Testing To Be Tightened Even Further By EU

Thursday, 25. February 2016

The EU Commission had already made it clear that emission testing would be tightened up from 2017 but they have now announced that they will be going several steps further. As a result of growing mistrust of the emissions testing procedures which were to reflect real life motoring conditions by 2017 the Commission has announced a number of additional rules.

First of all, instead of randomly selecting cars off production lines to test they will in future be selected from cars that are already on sale as well as cars from production lines. Recalls will be issued if cars are found to emit different levels of regulated emissions than those suggested by the manufacturer. Financial ties between European test centres and the manufacturers will be cut (I didn’t know there were any), thus making the system fairer.

It seemed that testing could be carried out in any country within the EU in the past for it to be accepted across the EU. So manufacturers were having cars tested at centres where they knew controls were more lax. This is being address with greater controls being imposed upon the test centres.

The Commission is also applying for additional powers to suspend, restrict or withdraw the number of services that a test centre can offer if it is performing at a less than acceptable level. The Commission is also pushing for access to new car ‘software protocols’ and the ability to restrict the use of such devices as the ‘defeat device’ used by VW. I’d have thought these sorts of devices should be banned rather than just restricted!

Whilst it seemed to be a move in the right direction there were some observers who believed the new rules still ‘lacked teeth’. In a damning statement Greg Archer, green vehicles director at campaign group Transport & Environment said, ‘Without the threat of future EU sanctions, it will be  mission impossible to break the strong bond between national regulators and their car makers that has protected the industry but at the cost of higher emissions.’

And I thought I was outspoken! The EU Parliament is now considering the proposals ahead of a debate and vote. If approved the new rules will come into force immediately = as if that could happen! Ridiculous! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Graham Hill’s Euro 6 Masterclass

Monday, 15. February 2016

This week, following the VW emissions debacle, I’m going to give you a master class in understanding the new Euro 6 legislation and the effect on both petrol and diesel engines along with some relevant information that I hope you will find of use.
It’s not as boring as you might think because there has been a major change to the driver maintenance of diesel cars that you might like to consider before choosing diesel for your next car. I won’t go through the whole of the European Emission standards since they were introduced in July 1992 but I’ll touch on a couple of relevant points before bringing you bang up to date and reveal a couple of things you may not know about.
When Euro 1 was introduced it was really set up to provide drivers with information about the emissions from their new cars. Whilst limits were set for just a few of the exhaust emissions, CO2, Hydrocarbons (HC) + Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Particulate Matter (soot) they were more advisory rather than enforceable.
At the time there was a lot of discussion going on around CO2 and the effect on the environment but more important on the atmosphere, remember the discussions about the holes in the ozone layer? So as each new standard was introduced by the EU they changed from being advisory to statutory and more emissions became regulated. Testing standards were introduced and standard test conditions were introduced to laboratory standards.
Cars tested are not, as some believe and reported on recently, selected by the manufacturer and passed over for testing. Test cars are normal cars randomly selected from the production line and tested whilst being witnessed by Government agencies. In every case there has to be consistency. The environment is very carefully controlled.
The temperature, fluid levels and even tyre pressures are all set. This is about to change in 2017, something I don’t agree with, when they carry out measurements on the road instead of in the lab using portable measuring equipment. This will be known as Real World Driving Emissions (RDE). Really? what the hell is ‘real world’?
Its the same argument over fuel consumption figures. I can drive my car down the same stretch of road 3 days running and return three different MPG’s. Stick my son behind the wheel and you’ll return different readings again. In my opinion there is no such thing and once a car is out on the open road all sorts of dodgy things can be done to ‘fool’ the test equipment.
Anyway, back to Euro 6 which came into force in September 2015. This set the standard for petrol and diesel engine measurements and set emission limits. The limits are set for CO2, along with NOx (the gas that VW was misrepresenting), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Hydrocarbons (THC and NMHC) and finally Particulate Matter that is particular to Diesel (get it – sorry about that).
Whilst CO2 has always been the main concern of environmentalists and Governments around the world NOx has come to the fore with links to lung conditions and even premature death. These links are always debatable but assuming that the data is accurate the problem was already being dealt with by the EU with the introduction of Euro 6. The Euro 1 level of NOx was 780mg/km for diesel engines and 480mg/km for petrol.
Euro 5 saw diesel levels drop to 180mg/km, a huge drop and Euro 6 dropped the level in diesels to 80mg/km compared to 60mg/km for petrol – virtually the same. But in order to achieve this result in diesel cars an additive needs to be added to the diesel, something I’ll come onto in a moment.
There are two questions arising. Are diesels being unfairly demonised and as a driver should you be selecting petrol or diesel for your next car? Fuel consumption is still a big deciding factor for those covering high mileage but should it be such a deciding factor when most drivers are covering around 10,000 miles per annum?
Town mileage can in fact be more economical driving a petrol car compared to a diesel and with Ford working towards a petrol engine that will return 100mpg we may not be far away from the time when petrol cars are more frugal than diesel. But by then the environmentalists will complain that petrol engines always have and always will kick out more CO2’s than diesel. So what should you consider and what has Euro 6 changed?
First of all diesel’s spew out particulates, soot to you and I. However, these are captured by a particulate filter fitted into the exhaust system. However, the particulates are captured in the filter which then needs to be maintained to prevent blockage which will result in lost performance and ultimately the replacement of the filter which can cost up to £2,000.
In order to ‘clean’ out the filter you need to drive the car at more than 50mph for more than 15 minutes every month (see the manufacturer’s handbook). This creates a chemical action that effectively burns off the soot but for some who only drive locally this can be a bit of a chore. There is also the driving style when driving a diesel car. Even the latest cars suffer from a little turbo lag,
This means when pulling away from lights or out of a junction, you put your foot down on the accelerator and it takes a second to get the power into the wheels. You get used to it but it feels a bit weird if you have never driven a diesel before. Oh and a personal tip, always put a plastic glove on when filling up a diesel, in fact I always put two on as the smell seems to immediately absorb into your hand and stay with you for a week, even worse if you transfer onto the steering wheel. Petrol isn’t anywhere near as bad.
Another factor is cost. Generally diesel cars are more expensive than petrol to buy but when it comes to leasing diesels are in such high demand that the resale value ends up making diesel’s cheaper to lease than petrol so a bit of an advantage there. So what has Euro 6 done to make diesel’s less attractive? Well, in order to achieve the lower NOx emissions cars now require an additive called AdBlue.
In most cases the AdBlue reservoir is sufficient to last between services but as some drivers have found, depending on driving style and types of journey the reservoir needs to be topped up between services. Whilst you can buy AdBlue from anywhere that sells oil such as Halfords and is relatively cheap if misused or not topped up when the indicator light comes on you could be into some costly repairs or at best the engine not starting. So bear in mind if you are about to buy or lease a new diesel AdBlue is now something else to take into account.
Finally there seems to be a tide of hate spreading across the country against diesels. Boris has started the ball rolling by saying that any pre-Euro 6 cars will have to pay an extra tenner to enter what is known as the Ultra Low Emission Zone in London. Some councils have already started to charge extra for parking permits if you drive a diesel. Islington Council in London is set to introduce a surcharge of £96 for anyone with a diesel car from April and they don’t seem to be differentiating between Euro 6 and pre-Euro 6. Totally unfair!
So there you have it, you can now make an educated decision between petrol and diesel. The only other thing I haven’t mentioned is Benefit In Kind tax if you run a car through a limited company. The chancellor had planned to eliminate the 3% loading on diesel cars but following the emissions issues with VW he took the ill informed decision to retain it. By Graham Hill

 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Car Industry Is Suffering A Major Labour Shortage

Monday, 15. February 2016

When I was out with my mates on a Friday night when I was in my twenties, our topics of conversation didn’t include things like the economy, immigrant crisis (although with the surge of immigrants from India and Pakistan at the time maybe it should have been), the weather or the price of a loaf of bread.

As none of us was particularly passionate about football it meant that the whole of the evening was taken up discussing women, cars and more cars. We were preoccupied with radial tyres, straight through exhaust systems and go faster stripes but the new generation of car drivers struggle to understand the concept of checking oil levels and tyre pressures, more interested in the number of watts that the stereo system kicks out and whether the car has heated seats.

There is still a passion for driving cars but not for the way cars are made and run, hence the reason why I believe we have a serious skills deficit in this country. We know that there is a lack of doctors and nurses and some joke about the number of plumbers, electricians and carpenters that have come to the UK from Poland, because we have a lack of qualified specialists in the UK.

But I wasn’t aware that we had a similar problem in the car industry. It seems that manufacturers are having to look abroad for people to work in engineering and on the factory floor because we have a severe skills shortage. I was as surprised to read that it doesn’t stop there.

We even have a severe shortage of sales staff to work in dealership showrooms. Andy Palmer, CEO of Aston Martin who started working with the company as an apprentice, said that the problem spreads wider than the manufacturers.

The problem exists within the manufacturers of hi-tech parts that fit into the cars, they are also having to search abroad for labour or have the parts made abroad and import them. Part of the problem is the growth of the industry which is suffering from its own success.

Whilst the industry continues to grow faster than most other industries, with not enough people to fill the vacancies, there will continue to be a need to bring in labour from abroad, something that this Government seems to be fighting against. The same problem exists in my industry, that of brokers.

When I attend events that are attended mainly by finance brokers it is clear that our industry doesn’t encourage women to join the industry and with an average age closer to 60 than 20 there are few youngsters coming into the industry. This is all very worrying. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Big Hike In Insurance Premiums For Over 50’s

Wednesday, 27. January 2016

We all know that putting a sub 25 year old behind the wheel of a car is a little like walking into a lion’s den filled with lions that haven’t eaten for a week with half a pig over your shoulder and a cut on your finger. It isn’t sensible. But it happens, not the lion thing, young drivers behind the wheel, so it isn’t surprising that young drivers don’t take out a loan to pay for their insurance they take out a mortgage – and as an older driver I believe rightly so.
But I was shocked to read that the insurance companies have imposed the biggest increases on the over 50’s in the last year. Their premiums increased by an average of 16.4%, the largest of all age sectors. So if you are about to renew your insurance and you are over 50 make sure you look around for the best deal and take my advice and include legal cover, it doesn’t cost a lot but could save you a fortune if a dispute followed an accident and could even be used to sue your own insurer if you have difficulties getting a payout. By Graham Hill

 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Driver In A Quandry Over Diesel Particulate Filter

Wednesday, 27. January 2016

Here’s an interesting story which presents a problem for which I don’t have an obvious solution. Justin Byrd has a diesel Nissan X-Trail. Whilst driving it a while ago a light illuminated on his dashboard indicating that he had a problem with his diesel particulate filter (DPF).
Now if you don’t know how a DPF works, it is part of the exhaust system and filters out particulates (soot) from the engine’s diesel emissions. In order for the filter to function properly you should run the engine at over 50mph for at least 15 minutes every month. This doesn’t ‘blast’ out the particulates, that would be pointless as you would just be dispersing into the atmosphere the soot that you filtered out in the first place.
Actually, by sustained running of the car at over 50mph the filter heats up causing a chemical reaction within the filter which effectively turns the soot into a non-toxic gas leaving the atmosphere relatively clean. Unfortunately if you don’t run up the engine, as explained, the filter will clog and will eventually need replacing as Justin Byrd found out to his horror.
After taking the car to his local Nissan dealer he was told that he shouldn’t drive the car as he would only cause further damage. After attempting to force regenerate the DPF the garage told Mr Byrd that he had no choice but to replace the DPF at a cost of £1,240. He decided to get a second opinion from another local but non-franchised garage.
They said he needed to run the car in 4th gear on the motorway and the blockage would disappear. He took the car for a spin then booked it into the garage who also took the car for a sustained drive following which the blockage disappeared and the warning light extinguished. As far as the garage was concerned the dealership had been conning John but the dealer, along with Nissan, suggested that the test equipment showed clearly that the particulate filter was no longer functioning and needed replacing. So here’s the thing, supposing the car was still under warranty.
By not replacing the particulate filter as recommended by the dealer would he now have breached the warranty terms? I know I bang on about the Sale of Goods Act (now the Consumer Rights Act) giving you more power than the manufacturer’s warranty but would he now be exposed if the engine failed.
I would suggest that if that were to happen he would have a claim against the garage that suggested he simply needed to give the car some welly! But it certainly raises an interesting point, where do you stand if the dealer, the manufacturer and their test equipment says one thing but another qualified engineer says something different. Think I need a lie down to ponder that one! By Graham Hill

 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Big Fines If Companies Don’t Conform To Consumer Rights Regulations

Wednesday, 27. January 2016

Now here’s a bit of information you should be aware of if you provide goods or services to consumers. Some rather swish rules came into force in 2013 called (deep breath) The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013.
In the regulations, which have now been incorporated into the Consumer Rights Act 2015, they state that you must make a copy of your complaints procedure available to customers or you could be fined up to £5,000 and/or face prosecution.
If you weren’t aware of this you probably aren’t aware of your other responsibilities under these regulations so I would suggest that you check them out. Would a customer be able to return goods or not pay for services received because you didn’t conform to the act? Maybe, maybe not but I would certainly not want to be the one to put it to the test. By Graham Hill

 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Will VW Survive The Emissions Debacle?

Wednesday, 27. January 2016

We all knew that VW would be eased somewhat off the hook if another manufacturer was found to be fiddling with emissions but is it getting too late? The Americans are hell bent, it would seem, on bringing down VW whilst electing the most bizarre human being on the planet as its president.
Is it just me fixated on his amazing hair art every time he appears on the TV, trying to work out where it starts and where it finishes? Just me then! But with Renault coming to the rescue is it all too late? The chances are that VW will survive, not without a lot of pain but as the biggest manufacturer in the world it is highly unlikely that the company will collapse.
In fact if they continue heavily discounting cars whilst producing some of the best on the road (emissions aside) I can see them growing even bigger. So what has happened at Renault? Well so far they have recalled 15,000 cars because of ’emission inconsistencies’ in order to have them checked.
It is said that there is a difference between test rig readings and real life readings – what a surprise. But this isn’t down to a deliberate attempt to fool the testing equipment as was the case with VW. A question was raised with regard to Peugeot Citroen and why they didn’t seem to have the same problems? The answer was in the technology. Renault uses a somewhat dated and cheaper method of reducing NOx by using what they refer to as an NOx absorber or NOx trap.
It captures Nitrogen Dioxide and burns it as opposed to the Peugeot Citroen method called Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). Whilst Renault is using the new method on its trucks it is yet to move across with its cars. The old method is cheaper and easier to fit but also makes the car less efficient and can lead to variations in emissions. I can’t see much happening to Renault as a result, especially as they are already in the throes of moving across to the better and more stable method anyway.
It also means that VW are still hanging out to dry! Incidentally the EU is working flat out (yer right) to come up with a new emissions testing regime which will closer reflect ‘normal’ driving conditions – whatever they are! By Graham Hill

 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Do We Need A New Scrappage Scheme?

Friday, 11. December 2015

We seem to be having a week of environmental issues! MP’s have prepared a new clean air report for consideration by the Government. In it they recommend that a new scrappage scheme be introduced for diesels and vehicle excise duty (car tax) should be based on nitrogen oxides as well as CO2 and not just CO2 as it is at the moment.

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

The report was presented to the Chancellor before his Autumn Statement by the Environmental Audit Committee in a hope that he would take note and encourage people out of ‘polluting diesels’. The chairman of the committee, Huw Irranca-Davies, urged the Chancellor to strike a better balance, he went on to say ‘A National scrappage scheme could provide a shortcut to cleaning up the air in our cities.’

Whilst the Chancellor only retained the 3% benefit in kind loading on diesels in the Autumn Statement that’s not to say that more won’t be done in next year’s budget. My own view is that whilst we should focus on the environment we should stop all this knee jerk reaction, the like of which we’ve seen following the VW debacle.

They did it with pay day lenders which has ended up taking out competition and increasing the use of illegal money lenders and by extending the rules into the whole of the consumer finance industry, to an unnecessary degree, they could end up pushing us back into recession.

Things may look good for the Chancellor at the moment but will it still look quite so rosy in a year’s time when ‘affordability tests’ become the focus of attention by the PPI lawyers? By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Did VW/Audi Have The Solution To A Cleaner Environment All Along?

Friday, 11. December 2015

Following on from my previous blog post in which I was musing over the next steps to a cleaner environment. Maybe VW/Audi had the answer all along!

Thinking of a change but unsure as to the best way to finance your car? Then you need a copy of my car finance book, Car Finance – A Simple Guide by Graham Hill. Click on the link below to buy the best car finance book on the market, available as a Kindle Book and Paper Back.

Rather than fiddle the emission figures they have been working in the back room on a revival of the hydrogen fuel cell, something of which I’m a great supporter. According to their press releases the car will be more dynamic and more efficient than anything else in production.

The only thing they haven’t revealed is the bodystyle they will use to launch the new technology. Audi have produced hydrogen powered concept cars in the past as A2 and Q5 models and they have recently been showing off the A7 h-tron prototype which can power to 62mph in 7.9 seconds with a range of 300 miles.

Dr Rene Van Doom, powertrain engineer for fuel cell technology, confirmed that Audi has four major priorities for the immediate future, one of which is alternative drivetrains. He added that Audi were set to go into volume production with fuel cells as soon as the market and infrastructure justifies the move.

Their 10 year plan includes providing an electric alternative for every model in its range. With mild hybrid (whatever that is), plug in or hydrogen cell system. In 2016 a new 48 volt hybrid will be launched with an electric compressor to eliminate the annoying turbo lag and boosting efficiency by shutting down the engine when coasting.

If that wasn’t enough to put them ahead of the game again they are now working on electronic dampers that not only reduce body roll but they use the movement to regenerate kinetic energy to charge your mobile phone and air-con in the way that kinetic energy generated in hybrid cars recharges batteries. They claim that they can recuperate 150 watts meaning a CO2 saving of 3g/km. Amazing!

They also mentioned that they still understand the importance of internal combustion engines and will not neglect development of this technology. Good to hear! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks