The Best Car Finance Blog In The World

Drivers with eye conditions are being warned about imminent policy changes which could result in a £1,000 fine and three points on their licence.

The DVLA has confirmed it is set to update its guidance for drivers with eye conditions in the coming weeks.

This comes after the Association of Optometrists (AOP) raised concerns over the published list of notifiable health conditions in October last year.

The AOP highlighted the current DVLA guidance was not specific enough and suggested every driver in the UK who receives an eye test will need to be advised to tell the DVLA, rather than it just affecting those with eye conditions which could impact their driving.

If it is determined bad vision is a factor of a driving accident, the driver will be fined £1,000 and have three points on their licence if they had not notified the DVLA of their condition prior to the accident.

Failure to notify about vision loss or issues could even result in a driving ban in more serious cases.

This is why it is important for the guidance to be clear and specific to those with medical conditions on whether they need to update the DVLA of their condition.

Insurers Quotezone have identified other conditions that could prevent motorists from legally taking to the road or invalidate their insurance – leaving them unprotected in the case of an accident.

Greg Wilson, founder of Quotezone.co.uk, said: “It is important for all drivers to be aware of the medical conditions DVLA needs to be aware of.

“Many of the conditions named by the DVLA won’t actually affect your ability to drive, but they do need to be kept up to date with any changes.

“Taking all precautions to be safe on the road is extremely important and drivers must play their part to ensure their well being and the wellbeing of other road users is protected to the best of their knowledge.”

The DVLA has an extensive list of over 110 conditions that can affect driving, so some motorists may be unaware of all of these conditions or the extent to which they can affect driving ability.

Wilson said some lesser known conditions can carry an increased risk and therefore insurance premiums can be higher – or more seriously, some ailments can even result in the driver’s licence being revoked.

He said: “If drivers have been diagnosed with any of these conditions they need to inform both the DVLA and their insurance provider, since having inaccurate details on the insurance policy can void the insurance and leave drivers unprotected.”

Drivers can report their eye condition online to the DVLA here.

Here are some important health conditions drivers must make the DVLA aware of:

1. Syncope

Syncope is a condition that causes a temporary loss of consciousness. Fainting conditions including syncope, which causes blackouts, must be reported to the DVLA.

2. Certain operations

Operations on certain body parts, including your legs, can exempt you from driving, yet this can be up to the discretion of the doctor, who should inform you on driving procedures after leaving the hospital.

3. Heart conditions

Any heart conditions must be reported to the DVLA. For example, arrythmia must be reported as it can affect the ability to safely stop a car, and can be distracting.

4. Stroke

After having a stroke it is possible that you may be able to drive again in the future, but initially you must stop driving for one month after having a stroke. If you have returned back to normal health after a month, you can start driving again, however the DVLA needs to be informed if health problems still persist for longer than a month after the stroke.

5. Vertigo

Recurrent or sudden dizziness must be reported to the DVLA as it may effect your ability to remain safe on the roads. By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

Car buyers have been warned that any step-change in EV battery technology could create future shocks for residual values, according to FleetCheck.

Toyota has recently said it is working on new solid state battery technology that could deliver over 900 miles of range.

The average battery range for new electric vehicles is already almost 300 miles, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT).

Peter Golding, managing director at the fleet software specialist FleetCheck, said the major advances in technology could present predictable effects.

Golding said Toyota’s solid state designs, CATL talking about doubling energy density and Mullen Automotive’s improved battery management to name a few, is welcome, but also creates problems.

He said: “A manufacturer who has access to better batteries is going to want to make them available as soon as possible in order to gain a competitive market advantage but this is going to affect EVs already in use.

“It won’t render them obsolete but it could make them much less attractive, especially if the new tech is not just more effective but cheaper, which is conceivable.”

Golding said that while values on current EVs are unlikely to collapse completely, there could be major reductions.

He added: “This would have a substantial impact on leasing companies too, of course, who are already being very conservative in their EV future forecasts thanks to the quite dramatic drop in values seen over the last year.

“Buying EVs and bearing the RV risk remains a risky business.

“It seems to us that there is no way around this situation.

“EVs are still a relatively new technology in a mass market sense and step changes in technology are very much a possibility but any advances will probably be a double edged sword and fleets need to factor that into their decision making.”  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

A potentially massive data leak is being looked into by the authorities after it was alleged Tesla failed to adequately protect data from customers, employees and business partners.

The data protection watchdog for the Netherlands said on Friday (May 26) it was aware of possible Tesla data protection breaches, but it was too early for further comment.

Germany newspaper Handelsblatt reported on Thursday (May 25) that Tesla had allegedly failed to protect data, citing 100 gigabytes of confidential data leaked by a whistleblower.

“We are aware of the Handelsblatt story and we are looking into it,” a spokesperson for the AP data watchdog in the Netherlands, where Tesla’s European headquarters is located, told Reuters.

They declined all comment on whether the agency might launch or have launched an investigation, citing policy. The Dutch agency was informed by its counterpart in the German state of Brandenberg.

Handelsblatt said Tesla notified the Dutch authorities about the breach, but the AP spokesperson said they were not aware if the company had made any representations to the agency.

Tesla was not immediately available for comment on Friday on the Handelsblatt report, which said customer data could be found “in abundance” in a data set labelled “Tesla Files”.

The data protection office in Brandenburg, which is home to Tesla’s European gigafactory, described the data leak as “massive”.

“I can’t remember such a scale,” Brandenburg data protection officer Dagmar Hartge said, adding that the case had been handed to the Dutch authorities who would be responsible if the allegations led to an enforcement action.

The Dutch authorities has several weeks to decide whether to deal with the case as part of a European procedure, she added.

The files include tables containing more than 100,000 names of former and current employees, including the social security number of Tesla CEO Musk, along with private email addresses, phone numbers, salaries of employees, bank details of customers and secret details from production, Handelsblatt reported.

Adrianus Warmenhoven, a cybersecurity expert at NordVPN, said: “Autonomous intelligence technology is the most advanced type of AI, as it removes the need for human intervention.

“While we may still be a long way off a driver being able to take their eyes off the road, we are still putting faith in something which we don’t yet fully understand.

“This new technology is being designed with the driver in mind, but it is crucial that cybersecurity is not forgotten, as there may be dangers hiding beyond the control panel.

“It would take hackers a lot of work to bypass the built-in security features of these cars, but they could still find a way.

“Ransomware, wireless carjacking, key fob cloning and cyber-attacks on connected devices in the hardware and software of the car are all potential security concerns that could arise.

“This is an exciting time for car makers and the potential positives of self-driving cars outweigh the negatives. However, without a strong cybersecurity focus to future-proof these desirable vehicles, there is a risk criminals could already be preparing to manipulate this technology — so they can make a quick getaway without a hand on the steering wheel. By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

Charge point operator Gridserve has increased the cost of charging an electric vehicle (EV) on its Electric Highway network.

The price rise took effect yesterday (Thursday, June 1), with the cost of using its high-power chargers increasing by 3p per kWh, to 69p/kWh.

To simplify pricing, and also to reduce some confusion around the levels of power delivered, Gridserve is also moving all DC chargers, including its medium-power chargers and those at our Electric Forecourts, to the same pricing.

The charge point operator said that one rate for all DC chargers on its network will “avoid unnecessary confusion of different rates at different locations, or even different rates at the same location”, where it has multiple charging speeds.

It added: “While DC charging will increase slightly at this time, we’ve been able to keep our AC chargers at 49p/kWh, to remain as affordable as possible and still below the industry average.”

It acknowledged that the price for DC charging may be “unwelcome news”.

“We also hope you appreciate that Gridserve have held our pricing below that of competing networks for some time now, whilst our cost base has continued to inflate, in some cases above our pricing,” it explained

“It vitally important that we continue to ramp up investment in chargers, people, materials, and in our supply-chain partners, to deliver the infrastructure, services and confidence necessary to support the transition to EVs in the earliest possible timeframes.”

Gridserve says it needs to do this in a way that is sustainable for both its business, and its customers.

“That’s why we are only marginally increasing pricing, and even at the new levels will remain amongst the most competitively priced charging in the UK for high-power chargers,” it said.

Pre-authorisation limit for charging an EV

Gridserve has also announced that it is updating its Rugby Services Electric Super Hub pre-authorisation limit.

While it is able to keep its pre-authorisation to £1 across the rest of the Gridserve Electric Highway, the Tritium chargers at Rugby need a higher pre-authorisation to begin the charge session.

The charger then delivers energy up until it reaches the pre-authorisation limit and stops the charge.

Gridserve explained: “We’ve received a lot of feedback from customers that this is often an inconvenience, as they have to return to their cars to re-start charging when they haven’t reached the required state of charge.

“In order to try and limit disruption to our customers charging sessions, we are increasing the pre-authorisation limit to £35 at Rugby Services. This is still among the lowest in the industry and we will endeavour to keep it that way.”

It continued: “Price rises will never be welcome news but our promise to you is that we will continue to invest heavily in strengthening the UK’s charging provision so that drivers have the confidence to switch to electric vehicles and the transition to electric happens in the shortest possible timeframes to limit climate change and the negative impact on our planet.”  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

By David Bartlett, head of accident management, AA Business Services

The days of being guaranteed a courtesy car while your vehicle is being repaired are largely behind us.

The automotive market and landscape have changed and are continuing to evolve.

A myriad of factors has impacted the availability of courtesy vehicles, and the reality is that they’re now in limited supply, regardless of insurance agreements for their provision.

The current landscape

As a result of global factors including the Covid 19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, hire car providers are facing pressures, like many areas of industry, that are impacting the availability of vehicles.

One of the main challenges they’re facing is rising costs and this can be largely attributed to resourcing and energy.

Labour market shortages have put upwards pressure on wages. Together with an increase in the National Living Wage of 9.7% and rising inflation, this has contributed to a perfect storm in the rising cost of resourcing.

The price of petrol and diesel has also reached record highs over previous months. This has hit rental companies hard, as every delivery and collection requires a runner car that incurs the cost of an additional driver and fuel.

Worldwide, there’s been an average increase of 47% in rental costs, so if rental is your contingency, these costs need to be factored into budgets.

Due to ongoing supply chain challenges, we’re still seeing a delay and shortage of new vehicles coming to market, pushing up the price of new and second-hand cars as well.

In the past few years new vehicle costs have risen over 20% and in some cases its over 40% for used vehicles.

It’s therefore simply not a viable option for most repairers to increase the number of courtesy vehicles, extend leases or replace those ageing or unfit, leaving them with a smaller fleet.

Coupled with this, order delays for a number of parts are extensive and unpredictable, which is out of repairers’ hands, and in some cases, this results in fleets of courtesy cars being tied up with drivers for longer. And this is a worldwide problem.

So stark is this issue in certain areas that there have been recent reports of some insurers and fleets writing off historically repairable cars to save themselves the rising costs of providing courtesy cars. This is more of an issue or policies that include a credit-hire for drivers.

A further and developing challenge placing demands on bodyshops is insurance policies for electric vehicle (EV) drivers which stipulate the provision of replacement EV courtesy cars.

As it stands, EVs aren’t an affordable option for most repairers and, even if they were, the majority don’t yet have the fast-charging infrastructure to turn these vehicles around quick enough, let alone navigate the increased energy costs and minimal uplift in rates for such requests.

Alongside – and as a consequence of – this changing landscape, we’re seeing an ageing profile in short-term fleet operations.

To effectively manage this, and navigate the current supply challenges, requires ongoing innovation to find the best solutions to minimise fleet costs and downtime and this is what we’re doing at the AA in close partnership with our suppliers and partners.

Taking control

So, what does this mean for fleets? With so many variables at play, fleets and drivers need to focus on what they can control.

One ball firmly in their court is their accident management programme.

So, where should you start? Firstly, turn attention to your insured events experience.

In the event of an accident that renders a vehicle off the road, regardless of where the fault is attributable, how’s your business going to be impacted?

This is a question that every organisation needs to know the answer to, and it will vary widely depending on the nature of the work carried out by employees – for example, are your employees desk based, or do they need to drive to carry out their role?

To get an accurate picture, it’s also important to undertake analysis of your accident management history.

This should include your average vehicle downtime and the cost of this to your business. Knowledge is power and it’s only through understanding how your business is affected by vehicles being off road that you can best plan to mitigate the impact on business.

Once you have the information you need, take action.

What this looks like will depend on the results of your analysis and shape of your organisation.

It may be that if your fleet is predominantly used for commuting and visiting customers, you need to update your company car policy to explain to drivers what they can do in the event of an accident without a courtesy car. This can include working from home, for example.

If your business relies on vehicles to operate, such as carry-out deliveries, then the solution will be more complex.

You can look at temporary options to implement such as vehicle rotation and amending shift patterns to maximise the use of all vehicles in operation at any one time.

We’re seeing the benefit of contingency planning for this purpose first-hand as many businesses now opt for an end-to-end accident management solution.

This sees the various – often very separate – aspects of incident management strategically linked into a single service.

It means working in close partnership with customers to keep their vehicles on the road, helping them to navigate the fast-changing landscape, while remaining safe and compliant at all times.

Looking ahead, it’s important we all acknowledge that the landscape has changed and we’re likely to see a further decline in the availability of courtesy cars. So, it’s important to adjust fleet expectations and be proactive.

Any organisation that operates a business-critical fleet needs to take action by adopting a robust end-to-end accident management solution.

This way they can maximise business productivity by minimising the risk of disruption in the event of an accident.  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

Toyota is developing new battery technology that will give future electric vehicles (EVs) a range of up to 932 miles (1,500km).

Unveiling its future EV plans, the manufacturer says that it will introduce a step-change in battery performance over the next five years. 

From 2026, it will introduce new battery technology offering a range of 1,000km (621 miles), by increasing the energy density of the battery, weight reduction and improving vehicle aerodynamics.

At the same time, it aims to cut costs by 20% compared to the current bZ4X and achieving a quick charge time of 20 minutes or less from 10-80% power.

Toyota is also developing low-cost batteries that it says will contribute to the spread and expansion of battery electric vehicles (BEVs).

The bipolar structure battery, which has been used in the Aqua and Crown hybrid vehicles, is now being applied to BEVs.

The battery uses lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and is expected to be available from 2026-2027.

The low-cost battery will offer a 20% increase on range compared to the current bZ4X (up to around 375 miles), but come with a 40% reduction in cost, and recharging in 30 minutes or less (10-80% charge).

However, it is the development of all-solid-state batteries which could deliver a step-change in how far the manufacturer’s car will trave on a single charge in the future.

Having discovered a technological breakthrough that overcomes the longstanding challenge of battery durability, the company says it is reviewing its introduction to conventional hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and accelerating development as a battery for BEVs.

It is currently developing a method for mass production, striving for commercialisation in 2027-2028.

The technology, it says, will deliver a 20% improvement in range compared to the 1,000km range promised from 2026, with an even quicker charge time of 10 minutes or less (10-80% charge). That would give Toyota a BEV range of up to 1,200km (745 miles).

A higher-level specification battery being developed at the same time, however, is aiming for a 50% uplift, delivering a range of up to 1,500km (932 miles).

“What we want to achieve is to change the future with BEVs,” Takero Kato, president of new Toyota EV unit BEV Factory, said in a video posted on the manufacturer’s YouTube channel today (Tuesday, June 13).

“We will launch the next-generation battery EVs globally and as a full line-up on the market from 2026,” Kato said.

Today’s announcement comes after Toyota revealed in April that it was continuing its investment in plug-in hybrid (PHEV) technology, with the aim to launch models that cover more than 120 miles on a single charge.

At the time, the carmaker said it planned to position its future PHEV models as the “practical BEV”, sitting alongside a strengthened line-up of electric and hybrid cars.

In April, the automaker sold 8,584 EVs worldwide, including under its Lexus brand, accounting for more than 1% of its global sales in a single month for the first time. By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

A UK-based battery company has developed an electric vehicle (EV) capable of being charged in under 6 mins with existing charging infrastructure.

Nyobolt has taken a systems level approach to develop batteries capable of charging in minutes by pioneering new materials, cell designs, efficient software control and power electronics.

Its vision is to match today’s convenience of refuelling at the pumps, but it says that has been impossible to achieve in today’s EVs, because batteries are big, heavy and costly, with vehicles often weighing over two tonnes.

The requirement for heavy EV battery packs places a huge strain on the supply of battery raw materials.

The Nyobolt EV weighs closer to one tonne than two, uses a 35kWh battery and is capable of fully charging with up to 250km range in under 6 mins with existing charging infrastructure, without sacrificing battery life.

Nyobolt has tested its batteries for more than 2,000 fast charge cycles without significant performance loss.

Sai Shivareddy, CEO at Nyobolt, said: “Unlocking the challenges faced by electric vehicle designers has been key to the development of our breakthrough fast-charging batteries.

“Previously, enabling a light weight fast-charging vehicle was not possible without compromising its lifetime and so people have been relying on costly and large battery packs in the vehicle.

“With our unique technology we have achieved a six-minute charge car and developed smaller battery packs that can deliver more power and charge in less time.

“Our partnership with Callum shows how adoption of system-level technology innovations can transform the future of electric vehicles and increase accessibility of EVs, including to the 40% of UK households who can’t charge their vehicle at home overnight.”

Nyobolt decided to work with designer Julian Thomson, who was inspired by his design of the Lotus Elise.

Thomson invited design and engineering business Callum to collaborate in the development of the vehicle.

The resulting EV, says Nyobolt, showcases how its battery technology can be readily adopted across the automotive industry.   

With Callum and Nyobolt working hand-in-hand, a system-level approach has addressed each element from materials, to cell, to pack, to drivetrain, to whole vehicle, it said.

David Fairbairn, managing director at Callum, added: “Nyobolt’s pioneering battery technology has provided us with a unique and inspiring opportunity to support in the design and execution of a vehicle set to mark the way forward for EV technology.

“The collaborative creativity, engineering capabilities and steadfast efforts of Nyobolt, Julian Thomson and Callum have resulted in an EV that is not only exciting technically for the industry, but something that is beautiful to behold, too.”

Nyobolt says its ready-to-deploy technology will go into production in early 2024. By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

Electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturers will have to report the product’s entire carbon footprint, from mining to production to recycling, as early as July 2024.

The data will then be used to set a maximum CO2 limit for batteries to apply from the end of 2027.

The new law, passed by the European Parliament, will only apply to EV battery makers selling to member states, not in the UK. It is unclear whether the UK Government will take a similar approach.

Alex Keynes, clean vehicles manager at green group Transport & Environment (T&E), said: “Batteries are already far more sustainable than burning oil in our cars, but they will soon have to be even better.

“New rules on carbon footprint, recycling and due diligence checks, provided they are properly implemented, will mean batteries sold in Europe will set the standard for the rest of the world.

“The next step is to put in place measures to bring to market smaller and affordable electric vehicles that use even less materials.”

Companies selling batteries in the EU will also have to comply with rules designed to prevent environmental, human rights and labour abuses in their supply chains.

The law will require battery-makers to identify, prevent and address a wide range of issues, spanning water pollution to community rights.

New EU recycling targets mean that from 2027, battery-makers will need to recover 90% of nickel and cobalt used, rising to 95% in 2031.

They would also need to recover 50% of lithium used in 2027, rising to 80% in 2031.  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

Transport for London (TfL) collected £73.3 million in fines from drivers using London’s ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ), last year.

Drivers who fail to pay the £12.50 charge receive a penalty charge notice (PCN) of £180, although this figure is reduced to £90 if paid within a fortnight.

The figures, obtained through a freedom of information request, show that the ULEZ generated more than £224m in 2022 – an average of £18.7m per month – with £151.3m coming through daily charges. 

The ULEZ was introduced in April 2019 to cover central London before being expanded to the North/South Circular boundaries in October 2021.

It will be expanded across the whole of the capital from August 29.

Earlier this year, TfL estimated that the expansion of London’s ULEZ would be worth up to £300m in its first year. However, it said that income from the pollution-cutting scheme is expected to be “negligible” by 2027.

TfL’s group finance director, Patrick Doig, told the London Assembly, its “central estimate” is for the ULEZ to generate an additional £200m in the 12 months after it is expanded to the Greater London boundary, from August 29 this year, with a “50% plus or minus” range from £100m to £300m.

TfL says that 95% of vehicles in the zone are expected to be compliant when the expanded ULEZ goes live, avoiding the £12.50-a-day charge, and compliance rates will increase incrementally each year thereafter.

To help fleets comply, a £110 million scrappage scheme has been opened up to more firms ahead of the ULEZ expansion.

From the end of July, businesses registered in London with fewer than 50 employees will be able to apply.

Currently, charities, sole traders and businesses with 10 or fewer employees registered in London can apply to scrap a van (£5,000 grant) or a minibus (£7,000 grant), retrofit certain vans or minibuses (£5,000 grant) or scrap and replace a van or minibus with a fully electric vehicle (EV) (£7,500 or £9,500 grant respectively).

As well as allowing bigger operators to apply, charities operating in London will also be able to scrap or retrofit up to three vans or minibuses instead of just one.

Furthermore, there will be a new grace period for sole traders, microbusinesses, small businesses, and registered charities who have ordered brand-new compliant vehicles, or if they have booked an approved retrofit appointment for a non-compliant light van or minibus.  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News

The price of diesel has fallen after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) expressed concern of weakening competition in the retail fuel market, new RAC analysis shows.

It suggests that over the two weeks since May 15, when the CMA issued its road fuel market study update saying average supermarket margins in 2022 had increased compared to 2019, the average price of a litre of diesel at supermarkets fell by 7.44p, from 151.02p to 143.58p.

The gap between the average prices of a litre of petrol and diesel at supermarkets was 9p on May 15, but by Monday (May 29) this had shrunk to 2.5p.

The RAC believes, however, that supermarket diesel prices should still be around 6p a litre lower than they are today (137p) if a fair price was being charged.

By comparison, the UK-wide average price of diesel is currently 147.44p per litre with unleaded at 143.14p – a gap of more than 4p.

Throughout April, however, the gap at the pumps averaged 14p a litre despite wholesale diesel being 4p cheaper than petrol.

The average price of a litre of unleaded at a supermarket is currently 140.64p while diesel is 2.5p more expensive at 143.14p.

RAC fuel spokesman Simon Williams said: “Since the Competition and Markets Authority’s made its announcement about supermarkets increasing their margins compared to three years ago and said they will be formally interviewing bosses, it appears the rate at which the price of diesel has fallen has sped up.

“Significant cuts to the price of supermarket diesel were long overdue as its wholesale price has been below petrol’s since the end of March. As a result average retailer margin on diesel had reached 22p a litre – more than three times the long-term average of 7p.

“Even today, with 27p having come off the average price of supermarket diesel since the start of the year, diesel drivers are continuing to get a poor deal.

“For two straight months it has cost retailers less to buy diesel on the wholesale market than it has petrol, yet they continue to charge more for diesel at the pumps.”

While wholesale price changes take some time to filter through to smaller forecourts which only buy new stock every few weeks, Williams says he cannot see any reason why the supermarkets still have not cut their prices to fairer levels as they buy much more frequently.

“We look forward to the results of the CMA’s review within the next four weeks and hope it heralds an end to poor value at the pumps,” he added.

“We also hope it means the biggest retailers start charging fair prices at all of their sites across the country, and not just at those where they’re competing directly with other forecourts locally.

“It can’t be right that the same brand can sell fuel for so much more in one part of the country than another – this sort of postcode lottery is wholly unfair to drivers and completely unjustifiable.”  By Graham Hill thanks to Fleet News