How Best To Use The Law To Resolve A Dispute With A Dealer

Friday, 22. April 2016

If you are a regular reader of my posts you will know what section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act is and the way that it makes the finance company jointly and severally liable in the event that you have a ‘fit for purpose’, ‘miss-representation’ or any other breach of contract claim against the dealer.

The general perception is that first and foremost the dealer is responsible so you immediately take up the problem with the dealer which invariably gets you into a bit of a dispute. However, I am reading about more and more cases whereby the customer has immediately taken up the case with the finance company, which tends to take the side of the customer and roll over, somewhat quicker and easier than the dealer, leaving a very happy client and the finance company to battle out the recovery of any money they have spent from the dealer – not your problem.

In fact it is often the case that before making finance available to a dealer he must sign up to an agreement that simply says that in a dispute with a customer that the funder settles, the dealer is responsible to refund the cost. The agreement, in my opinion, shouldn’t be needed as it is covered off in sub-section 2 of section 75 of the act, as follows:

75 Liability of creditor for breaches by supplier.

(1)If the debtor under a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement falling within section 12(b) or (c) has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.

(2)Subject to any agreement between them, the creditor shall be entitled to be indemnified by the supplier for loss suffered by the creditor in satisfying his liability under subsection (1), including costs reasonably incurred by him in defending proceedings instituted by the debtor.

The fact is that if you have taken out finance on a car, usually HP or PCP, and you feel that you have a claim against the dealer I would suggest that you challenge the finance company and if they ask you if you have already taken up the case with the dealer, point them in the direction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, section 75.

As an aside I asked a lawyer friend of mine in the industry why the lender is more likely to roll over and he explained that if you took up the case against the dealer your recourse would be via the fairly wet fish Trading Standards but if you escalate a claim against a lender your recourse would be via the gritty Financial Ombudsman Service and if they investigate a claim they immediately charge £550 per claim investigation (in fact I believe they are allowed 25 claim investigations before they incur a charge). So there you have it. By Graham Hill

Your Rights When Paying A Car Deposit By Graham Hill

Friday, 4. March 2016

When people hear about me and leasing a little late in the day. It is often the case that someone goes into a dealer, test drives a new or used car, negotiates a deal and pays a deposit, often much more than he or she needs to.put down.
They then find out, after contacting me, that there is an amazing deal on a new car that makes the cost cheaper than the used car or by choosing a different finance method can save a lot of money on the same new car supplied through me. As a result he wants to cancel his order with the dealer. Now legally this is a breach of contract but the good news is that the dealer can only legally recover his costs which must be ‘reasonable’.
So if you have paid £1,000 deposit and you cancel the order he has no right to keep the £1,000. He may be entitled to a few pounds admin costs and maybe a few pounds to re-advertise the car but that’s it, he must refund the balance. If he carries out a service and MOT at your request he may also recover those costs but even that is debatable because both add value to the car when he re-advertises.
My advice is pay as little as possible, say £100, and pay by credit card, it increases your legal rights phenomenally, even more so if you end up buying the car, especially if you pay the balance in cash. And if a dealer tries to keep your deposit get straight on the phone to your local trading standards office. By Graham Hill

 

Delayed New Car Deliveries Cause Part Exchange Problems

Tuesday, 2. August 2011

Now here’s an interesting scenario. As I’ve widely reported over the last 18 months or so deliveries of new cars have become a nightmare. All too often the dealer has called and said that delivery has been delayed not just by a couple of weeks but in some cases months. In most cases we’ve been able to get around the problem by extending the current Read more »

Don’t Be Misled By Warranties Removing Your Legal Rights

Thursday, 30. June 2011

The Citizens Advice Bureau Logo.

Image via Wikipedia

There has been a great deal of publicity recently about the way that customers are treated by car dealers with trading standards suggesting that millions of pounds of repairs are being paid for by customers when in fact the repairs are legally the responsibility of the dealer. Sadly this also includes legitimate warranty claims on cars covered by the Read more »

Car Dealers Trying It On Again!

Thursday, 2. December 2010

Credit cards
Image via Wikipedia

Auto Express recently carried a story, explaining how Stephen Larkin from Newcastle ordered a Skoda in March and was told that delivery would be delivered by early July at the latest. After passing this date he decided to cancel the order and wrote to the dealer saying he wanted to cancel the order as they hadn’t delivered the car and asked for his £1,000 deposit back. He sent numerous letters and calls to the dealer without joy along with no help from Skoda, all they said was that it was down to Read more »

Legal Redress If Car Is Misrepresented Including Fuel Consumption

Monday, 14. July 2008

In my book ‘An Insider Guide To Car Finance’ I provide a great deal of legal advice, obviously if you find yourself in a dispute you should consult a qualified solicitor. However, by way of advice, in these times of high fuel costs suddenly the advertised MPG figures become all important. So what happens when the figures provided by the manufacturer/dealer are incorrect? I often receive complaints about this subject but as the cost of fuel was under reasonable control no one seemed willing to enforce their legal position, however that may well start to change. So in order to clarify your position I would suggest the following. Read more »