Diesel Part 1 – The Latest RDE2 Standards

Thursday, 2. May 2019

The hope is these latest diesel engines could offer some respite to the beleaguered fuel, turning the tide on the anti-diesel rhetoric.

 

However, EU law-makers, who decided to subdivide the Euro 6 standard, rather than call RDE2-compliant cars Euro 7, have not helped that cause.

 

When the new vehicle emissions test, WLTP, replaced NEDC for all new type approvals in September 2017, the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) test was also introduced to offer an on-the-road measurement.

 

The limits for emissions remained the same but the testing regime changed and was reflected in a new standard – Euro 6b became Euro 6c.

 

Under the RDE test, the car is fitted with a portable emission-measuring system (PEMS) before being driven for 90 minutes on public roads in different conditions, with both uphill and downhill driving, and a mix of urban and rural roads and motorways.

 

It is being introduced in two stages, the step 1 test – RDE1 – became compulsory for all new type approvals from September 1, 2017, when WLTP was also introduced.

 

RDE1 will become mandatory for all new registrations from September 1.

 

WLTP testing, which takes place in the lab, has been mandatory for all new registrations since September 2018, with diesel cars having to meet the NOx limit of 80mg/km and petrol 60mg/km, with cars achieving the limit labelled Euro 6c.

 

New type approvals, however, have also had to meet the limits on-the-road from September 2017.

 

The EU has cut manufacturers some initial slack, allowing for a margin of error two times the actual limit. Cars achieving RDE1 are classified as Euro 6d-temp.

 

However, the rules will begin tightening from January 2020, starting with new type approvals.

 

This next stage, RDE step two (RDE2), is the measure now being achieved early by some manufacturers, giving fleets and company car drivers the benefit of a tax cut first announced in Budget 2017.

 

The NOx limit for the RDE2 standard is up to 1.43 times the Euro 6 lab limit of 80mg/km for diesel and 60mg/km for petrol. Cars achieving this limit are labelled Euro 6d.

 

RDE2 will apply to all new registrations from January 1, 2021, before the margin for error – the conformity factor – will be removed by 2023. By Graham Hill (Thanks to Fleet News)

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Claiming Compensation For Pothole Damage

Thursday, 25. April 2019

In 2012, a lawsuit was brought up against a McDonalds restaurant due to a slip and fall injury. In the suit a 54 year old woman claimed to have suffered a severe injury to her spine.

 

Over the course of the investigation, it was determined that the owner had received the proper guidelines on maintaining a clean working environment while keeping things safe and clean.

 

The final verdict came in that the staff of McDonald’s failed to follow the inspection protocol and there was spilt food/drink and the woman won $2.6 million in economic damages and $3 million for non-economic damages for diminished quality of life.

 

Whilst compensation in the UK is nothing like the compensation paid out in this case similar rules apply in slip and fall cases. And if my memory serves me correctly the lady involved actually spilt the ketchup in the first place.

So what has this got to do with potholes? When the roads in this country first started to deteriorate local authorities found it cheaper to pay for the occasional tyre blowout and bent alloy than repair the roads. You would take a photo of the pothole and send it with a receipt for the repair and the local authority paid out instantly.

 

Similar to the responsibility of those who maintain public spaces to make them safe for the public you would assume that the same applies to local authorities when it comes to potholes. But it seems to have changed and the same rules of responsibility apply. You now have to prove that the local authority was already aware of the pothole and did nothing about it. Or doesn’t have a maintenance programme in place. This has got to be wrong.

 

I always recommend that you take legal cover with your car insurance as they can give you legal advice in these circumstances and even send you a legal letter that you can use when claiming compensation. If you have a winnable case they may even take the council to court on your behalf..

 

If you haven’t got legal cover you can upgrade your policy or the RAC offers a very good policy for just £15 per annum. Always take advice from a financial advisor before taking out insurance. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Traffic Reduction Scheme Lengthens Journey Times

Thursday, 18. April 2019

Auto Express has highlighted deficiencies in the £317 million traffic reduction scheme that has had the reverse effect in some areas.

Called the National Pinch Point Programme, Highways England has admitted that the programme, designed to reduce congestion actually made traffic worse in some areas. 

 

The Government-owned organisation funded a total of 119 schemes across the UK between 2012/13 and 2014/15, of which 89 per cent were aimed at relieving congestion during specific time periods. It should be noted that traffic jams cost the UK economy £8 billion last year.
Although this aim was achieved during the targeted times, it resulted in worse congestion at other times of day, which Highways England said “outweighed” the benefits. 
Increased journey times during off-peak periods caused economic costs of £5.6m during the first year of the programme, while shorter journeys at peak times resulted in a benefit of £5.1m.
One of the main reasons seen for the increase in congestion during off-peak times was the introduction of new sets of traffic lights.
The analysis comes from a newly published Highways England report, for which the organisation evaluated 54 of the 119 schemes to see what the results were for their first year of operation.
The report concluded that, in future, such programmes need to “better consider how to mitigate the downsides while maintaining the upsides”.
Nicholas Lyes, head of roads policy at the RAC, described the report’s findings as “very disappointing”.
“While congestion has been reduced at peak times of the day, unfortunately, many schemes have seen increased traffic at off-peak periods, mostly due to traffic lights being introduced”, he said.
“Luckily, it seems as though there are some simple steps that can be taken to improve the worst of these new off-peak traffic flow issues, such as changing signals to work part-time instead of full-time.”
He added: “It is also important to realise that this work was not just about reducing congestion and that many schemes have seen small reductions in the number of road casualties.”
Personally, I find it absurd to come up with traffic calming schemes during rush hours but end up with journey times being lengthened at all other times. Also, the report into the schemes found that of the 54 assessed by Highways England, 20 were found to have decreased driver safety.
That is simply not good enough. According to latest figures from the EU we have the safest roads in Europe with 28 road traffic fatalities per million inhabitants. I would say that this is more as a result of luck than judgement.
Our roads are still in an appalling state, we are tinkering around the edges when it comes to congestion, we need new roads, and by fiddling around the way we have been those statistics will start to move in the wrong direction. By Graham Hill
Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

MP’s Call On A National Inquiry Into Pavement Parking

Friday, 12. April 2019

According to the Mail Online MPs have launched an investigation into drivers parking on pavements in England. The Transport Select Committee said it will examine the problems caused when vehicles are parked with at least one wheel on a pavement.

 

This is likely to include blocking access for wheelchair users and pushchairs, and damage to surfaces not designed to be driven over. Parking on pavements has been banned in London since 1974.

 

Outside of the capital it is only prohibited for lorries, but people who park in a dangerous position or cause an unnecessary obstruction can be fined. A mixture of criminal and civil sanctions are available to police and local councils to enforce restrictions on pavement parking.

 

Labour MP Lilian Greenwood, who chairs the committee, said: “This is an area where some people’s actions cause real difficulties for others. “Parking on pavements risks the safety of all groups of people from the littlest to the oldest, with differing needs.

 

“While we’re also inquiring into active travel – how we get more people into walking and cycling – we need to make sure it’s safe to take to the streets. “We want to hear from the public about the difficulties this presents and the solutions on offer.” The committee is calling for written evidence on the impact of pavement parking, the enforcement of existing rules and the need for new regulations.

 

AA president Edmund King said drivers should not leave vehicles in a position which is “anti-social” or restricts other people from using a pavement, but a blanket ban on pavement parking “would be a step too far”. He went on: “A street-by-street assessment is needed to decide where it may be suitable to allow pavement parking. Where pavement parking is allowed, seven out of 10 drivers say the bays should be marked out to show how much of the pavement can be used.

 

“Pavement parking poses problems on both inner city streets and rural lanes, so the outcome needs to be tailored to the circumstances.” RAC head of roads policy Nicholas Lyes said: “There are instances, particularly on Britain’s many narrow residential streets, where drivers believe they are doing the right thing by putting a wheel or two on the kerb so as not to impede road access for other vehicles and emergency services, while also making sure they leave enough space for people to use the pavement, especially wheelchair users and those with buggies.

 

“This inquiry should look carefully at how we can strike the right balance.” Personally, I despair of the ignorance of some drivers making it virtually impossible for mums with buggies and those in wheelchairs to get past a car parked three quarters the way across the pavement.

 

I reported a few years ago about a company in Canada who developed an app that enabled members of the public to take pictures on their mobile phones of drivers parking illegally, uploading photos and data onto the local authority website and being paid for the information after the driver had paid his fine that was auto issued. 

 

They tried to introduce the system into the UK without any success but with so few police about these days will there be an opportunity to introduce the app again to capture those parking illegally, smoking in cars with children on board, no seat belt secured, using a mobile phone whilst driving without Bluetooth etc.? It will only take one local authority to take it on board and everyone will become a traffic warden. By Graham Hill 

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Top 5 Most Common Causes Of Road Accidents

Friday, 15. March 2019

Business Car magazine has identified the top 5 causes of road accidents attributed to vehicle defects. Their investigation revealed the following:

 

Brakes                                     37%

Tyres                                       30%

Steering or Suspension            17%

Lights or Indicators                  9%

Vehicle Or Trailer Overload     7%

So there you have it, make sure that you take care of the above or risk an accident. By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Repair Costs Soar As New Technology Is Introduced?

Wednesday, 27. February 2019

According to industry experts, car manufacturers are getting so caught up in the race to launch new technology, they aren’t giving enough thought to, or guidance on, repairability.

 

This is resulting in increased costs and increased time taken in repairs and, in some cases, vehicles being written-off when they should be repairable. Long vehicle off-road times could also have implications for companies and drivers with regard to benefit-in-kind tax.

 

Richard Billyeald, chief technical officer at Thatcham Research, said cars are being brought to market without methods of repair being released. In one instance, repair methods were still not available six months after a car’s launch.

 

“Inevitably there is huge competition in the car market and technology is moving so fast it is in the interests of the car manufacturers to offer new features as quickly as possible. They’re always trying to compete with their rivals but, if there is nobody keeping a check on it, then things like reparability can lose their importance,” he said.

 

Terry Gibson, head of member services at the Independent Garage Association, said it was “not uncommon” for repair methods not to be available from launch, although the issue had been improving over time.

 

However, while it wouldn’t be a major issue for independent garages carrying out simple repairs, it could potentially delay crash repairs where a bodyshop would not proceed without a repair method from the manufacturer.

 

Thatcham wants to put reparability “back on the agenda” this year, starting with tackling “unnecessary” issues, particularly with electric vehicles (EVs), said Billyeald.

 

“You can have a relatively minor parking impact in which you might have done a bit of damage to the bumper or some of the panels –hitting a bollard, for example – and that then trips the fuse in the battery which then requires you to remove the battery and to reset it. Suddenly a £1,000 claim becomes an £8,000 claim – just unnecessary,” he said.

 

The cost of replacing batteries in EVs can also mean that a vehicle becomes uneconomical to repair, although, to put this into perspective the same would undoubtedly be true should a diesel or petrol engine require replacing.

 

Billyeald said that while the battery will not be damaged in every impact, when damage does occur, the battery has to be replaced “in pretty much every case”, unlike a petrol or diesel engine.

 

“It very much depends on whether it is a hybrid or a full EV but the (battery) price range is £6,000 up to £30,000,” he said, the price differential ranging from, for example, a Nissan Leaf to a long-range Tesla.

 

By comparison, it would typically cost between £5,000 and £10,000 to fit a new internal combustion engine (ICE). And in the case of an ICE you could fit a re-conditioned engine.

 

The bigger issue comes with the need to disconnect the battery when carrying out repairs, a situation experienced recently by Zip Water fleet manager Graham Short. In an article by Fleet News he explained, “I had a Volkswagen Golf GTE where the driver caught the wheel arch on a post; it was minor damage,” Short said. “It went into an accident repairer and they said ‘it’s got to go to VW to have the battery disconnected’.

 

We had to book it in with VW, who couldn’t do it for more than a week. The vehicle went in, the battery was disconnected and it was transported back to the bodyshop for the repair to be carried out. Then guess what? It had to be brought back to VW to be reconnected. The car was off the road for about two months just for minor damage.”

 

A Volkswagen spokesperson was “unable to comment” on Short’s experience but said that around 98% of its dealer network can repair an EV and can deactivate the high voltage system, if it’s not damaged.

 

If damaged, this may need the assistance of a specialist from one of 15 retailer-based battery repair sites or Volkswagen’s technical service centre in Milton Keynes.

 

The centres have been set up to complete more complex battery repair methods using the latest diagnostic equipment and highly-skilled Volkswagen technicians (known as high voltage experts). So much for making the servicing and maintenance of cars a level playing field.

 

Volkswagen said that if the batteries are physically damaged then most would need to be replaced but each repair is treated on a case-by-case basis. The spokesperson added that repair methods are available at launch for each new model.

 

Short has also experienced issues with parts availability – a problem which could become more widespread in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

 

“We had a Nissan e-NV200 hit while parked,” Short said. “It was not a big repair, but the van was off the road for a similar length of time because the parts could only be obtained from Japan.”

 

A Nissan spokesperson said: “Supply of parts for EV models is similar to any other ICE vehicle. We can experience pressure points, as do all manufacturers, but we encourage dealers to notify us of cases involving vehicles off the road so they can be prioritised.”

 

On the issue of EV reparability, “every Nissan dealer must be able to diagnose, service and repair electric vehicles”, the spokesperson said, and “depending on the diagnoses, battery functioning can be re-established by replacing individual modules, the battery casing or the entire battery”.

 

Checking EV battery health, meanwhile, is “a straightforward five-minute operation with the Consult diagnostic tool used by Nissan dealers across Europe”. Service and repair manuals are “published at the start of sales and updated regularly as required”, added the spokesperson.

 

While franchised dealers may be geared up to repair electric vehicles, it is “more challenging” for independents and the smaller bodyshops to invest in training and equipment, according to Billyeald.

 

“If they’ve got to buy equipment to cover all the manufacturers that’s a big ask,” he said.

 

This could potentially leave fleet operators with less choice about where their vehicles are repaired – figures from the FN50 show around 23% of leased cars and 33% of leased vans are repaired by independent workshops, which are typically cheaper than franchised dealers.

 

However, Gibson said: “More and more independent garages are embarking on training their technicians to service and repair hybrid and electric vehicles.

 

“This safeguards the business due to the potential risks associated with the high voltages within these vehicles and also presents them with business opportunities, differentiating them from local competitors.”

 

Fleet Assist, which provides leasing and rental companies with a network of 5,000-plus franchised and independent service outlets, said that “virtually all” have the capability to service and repair hybrid and plug-in vehicles.

 

Halfords Autocentres has trained 357 of its 1,500 technicians to IMI Level 2 in electric/hybrid vehicle maintenance, enabling it to service vehicles across its network of 316 autocentres.

 

Pete Marden, fleet director, said: “This training gives our technicians the confidence to work on these types of vehicles and access fault diagnosis to include battery performance via our Bosch KTS equipment.

 

“In July we introduced a new bespoke Halfords Hybrid Service offer to our customers. To date we have completed over 1,600 such services, around 1% of the total number of services over this period. This is above the percentage of penetration of electric vehicles within the market place so is proving a very successful alternative to the OEM dealer network for our customers.

 

“In the next financial year (April 2019 – April 2020) we plan to add the IMI Level 3 award in electric/hybrid vehicle system repair and replacement qualification to our training plans which will give us the added ability to repair these systems.”

 

However, given the relatively low number of hybrid and electric vehicles in the marketplace, a more pressing issue for repairers is that around 55% of new cars now have advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), such as autonomous emergency braking, fitted as standard.

 

These systems can use a combination of cameras, lasers and radars, which make repairs more complex and expensive, particularly if recalibration is required following an accident.

 

Fleet Assist head of network management Chris Crow said: “There is some marketplace confusion around which ADAS-equipped vehicles self-calibrate following windscreen replacement and which require recalibration.

 

“Automotive glazing is becoming more specialised through the technical nature of glass and many smaller businesses may not have the skillset, the ability to train staff or to invest in the recalibration equipment.

 

“That is resulting in a disconnect between glass fitment and the subsequent technical requirement for ADAS recalibration.

 

“In turn, that lack of clarity may lead to some fleets/drivers being confused as to when and where a vehicle should be recalibrated as some automotive glazing repairers have the capability to undertake the work, while others defer to franchised dealers. That could also result in a potential delay in the necessary work being undertaken as, once again, lead times have, in some cases, increased.”

 

Developments in headlight technology are also having an impact as they often have to be replaced rather than repaired when damaged.

 

Billyeald believes the increase in cost due to manufacturers moving from halogen to xenon technology a few years ago was “not unreasonable” but the recent proliferation of LED technology has made headlights “super expensive to replace”, particularly when matrix headlights, which dynamically move with the steering, are used.

 

“They give you fantastic visibility but, obviously, there are lots of moving parts and the costs are going up in line with that,” he said.

“We’ve seen huge price rises from £100 to a few thousand.”

This presents challenges for leasing companies and their customers.

 

Kit Wisdom, operations director at Tusker, told delegates at the BVRLA Industry Outlook event: “The broken headlamp at the end of contract could be £1,000-plus. The customer is not expecting that because that’s not what they’ve seen previously and, as an industry, we need to be better at communicating that.”

 

Jason King, managing director of Bayfield Vehicle Hire, added: “Low-level damage can spiral out of control. Something as simple as a chip in a windscreen can escalate to an £800 bill. We’re trying to understand ourselves why that is the case and then communicate that back to the customer.”

 

But it’s not just the technology in vehicles making repairs more difficult and expensive, it’s also the materials and joining techniques used by manufacturers as they strive to make vehicles lighter to meet strict emissions regulations.

 

Smart repairs can also be a contentious issue. Car manufacturers, in Billyeald’s view, can be “unreasonable” about where smart repairs are carried out on a vehicle fitted with sensors, which, again, can increase repair costs.

 

“We will be challenging vehicle manufacturers on that,” he said.

Gibson added: “There are instances where the vehicle manufacturers set limits on the type and areas of repair on bumpers to ensure safety systems continue to function as intended. This, on occasion, can lead to debate between garages and insurers, and garages and customers, due to the increased cost of having to replace a component that might otherwise have been a repairable proposition.”

 

Overall, repair bills rose 5% to £3 billion last year, with the average repair bill at £2,137, according to the latest data from the Association of British Insurers.

 

Costs are expected to increase further – the BVRLA Industry Outlook 2019 report predicts an average repair bill of £2,500, although some say it could be higher.

 

Tim Bailey, fleet director of Northgate Vehicle Hire, who worked in accident management prior to joining Northgate in March last year, said he was already seeing average costs of £2,500 and predicted it would “grow even higher than that” this year. He also expects more vehicle write-offs.

However, fleets should consider that, while repair costs are rising, they should see fewer crashes due to ADAS.

 

Billyeald said: “ADAS is all about preventing that crash or mitigating its impact so don’t just look at the cost, look at the overall picture – the number of write-offs and frequency of claims as well as the cost of them.”

 

Bayfield Vehicle Hire has already experienced the cost and safety benefits of ADAS.

 

King said: “We had one incident last year where one of our cars went into the back of an HGV. We thought the car would be written off, a total loss, and wondered how injured the passenger would be.

 

“But when we got in touch with the driver the passenger was all right and when we saw the vehicle it wasn’t too bad. That was partly down to the technology in the vehicle, the pre-collision braking had kicked in and taken over that situation. It could have easily been a total loss.”

 

BIK REDUCES WHEN CAR NOT AVAILABLE

Fleet managers need to keep a close eye on how many days a vehicle is off the road for BIK tax.

 

HMRC rules state that if a car is unavailable/off the road being repaired for a period of at least 30 consecutive days the chargeable benefit is reduced in proportion to the number of days during the year it was unavailable.

 

However, if the driver is in a courtesy car then BIK is charged as though their normal car was available without a reduction. The BIK charge may be adjusted where the replacement car is materially better than the normal car or the employee is provided with a better car under an arrangement.

 

Many thanks to Fleet News for the bulk of that article and the frightening warnings issued by the contributors. The dangers and cost to consumers and businesses is frightening. At the moment end of lease charges are not particularly high but the warning signs are there. Are we being overtaken by technology at the risk of making our cars far more disposable? Or leading to the bad old days of cut and shut, bodging repairs and putting lives in danger? Very sobering.

 

Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Shocking Revelations About Diesel Cars!

Wednesday, 27. February 2019

Latest testing that has been carried out by German automobile club ADAC has shown that some diesel cars emit almost no NOx, during on-road testing – suggesting the latest models are as clean, if not cleaner than their petrol counterparts.

 

So has this been a conspiracy all along? A way for local authorities and the Government to screw diesel car drivers out of money after following Government advice and taking a diesel car then taxing them to the hilt based on flawed information?

 

In fact the latest diesel engines emit significantly less nitrous oxide (NOx) than the upcoming Real Driving Emissions 2 (RDE2) regulations will require, according to this new research.

 

Following stringent testing by ADAC they have discovered that some diesel cars emit almost no NOx, during their on-road testing – suggesting the latest models are not just as clean as their petrol counterparts – but cleaner!.

 

In January 2020, tougher RDE2 rules will be introduced, requiring all new models (not existing models) launched to achieve 80mg/km or less (60mg/km for petrol). This will be a part of Euro 6d.

 

A conformity factor for the on-road test will be allowed, meaning the actual limit is 114mg/km for diesels and 86mg/km for petrols – significantly higher than any of the vehicles tested by ADAC.

 

In January 2021, all cars sold (including current models) must achieve the more stringent figures. The conformity factor will be removed by 2023.

 

Current rules (RDE) require diesel cars to emit no more than 168mg/km of NOx, but the worst performing car tested by ADAC – the Honda Civic diesel – emitted just 101mg/km. Following the WLTP re-homologation exercise that took place in 2018, the introduction of RDE2 will require all car makers to re-test their entire model ranges with an on-road test.

 

Nearly all the cars tested by ADAC emitted less than 50mg/km and the Mercedes C220d had no NOx emissions at all. The Volkswagen Golf diesel performed exactly the same as the petrol version, emitting 14mg/km of NOx. The best performing petrol car, a Suzuki Ignis 1.2, emitted 3mg/km.

 

ADAC performed the tests using a portable emissions measurement device (PEMS), in the same way as the official test. Under the current company car tax rules, diesel vehicles that achieve RDE2 will not require the 4% diesel surcharge to be included in a drivers benefit-in-kind tax.

 

Currently, only the Mercedes A220d and B200d have been officially tested and approved under the regulations. Jaguar has confirmed that the XF range will feature RDE2 approved engines by the end of the year.

 

Diesel car NOx emissions, as tested by ADAC:

Model RDE: NO x
in mg / km
Audi A8 50 TDI 15
BMW 520d Steptronic 5
BMW 520d Touring 1
BMW X2 xDrive 20d 23
Citroen Berlingo BlueHDI 130 7
Honda Civic 1.6 i-DTEC 101
Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 22
Mercedes A 180 d 40
Mercedes C 220 d 0
Opel Astra 1.6 D 1
Peugeot 308 SW BlueHDi 180 30
Volvo XC60 D5 AWD 56
VW Golf 1.6 TDI SCR 14

 

Petrol car NOx emissions, as tested by ADAC:

Model RDE: NO x
in mg / km
BMW 218i Active Tourer 8
BMW 230i Coupe 10
Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 4
Kia Ceed 1.4 T-GDI 10
Mercedes-Benz A 200 DCT 9
Renault Megane TCe140 15
Suzuki Ignis 1.2 3
Suzuki Swift 1.2 AWD 4
Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 9
Volvo XC40 T5 AWD AT8 9
VW Golf 1.5 TSI 14
VW Golf 1.5 TSI BM DSG 4
VW up! GTI 9

 

No doubt like me when I learned of the German tests I found it shocking. How many company car drivers are paying more in BIK tax than they should be and how many people are turning to petrol cars kicking out ozone destroying CO2 in the belief that they are better for the environment?

 

It’s a disgrace! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Where Should You Fit New Tyres – Front Or Back?

Saturday, 16. February 2019

You may think this is a daft question – simply replace the tyres that are worn – right? Front tyres generally wear out quicker than rears if your car is front wheel drive and rears wear quicker if rear wheel drive, so wouldn’t it be correct to replace the tyres that wear fastest with the new boots? No!

 

Most safety experts ignore the wear element or whether the car is front, rear or all wheel drive and suggest that you always put freshest tyres on the rear of the car. This is because if the car loses grip in a corner, it will either oversteer or understeer.

 

Unless you are an F1 fan you may not understand what this means. Understeer is when the front tyres lose grip in a corner causing the front of the car to slide out whilst oversteer means you lose grip at the back of the car, causing the rear of the car to swing out.

 

It’s actually easier to control a car that is understeering than one that is oversteering – simply slowing down should help to regain grip if the car is understeering. This is why it is important that you should maintain the greatest grip at the rear and fit your new tyres at the rear of the car. This will minimise the chance of potential oversteer and minimise the chance of a serious accident. Great advice eh! Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Could Your Car Become A Solar Panel?

Saturday, 16. February 2019

Hyundai and Kia (one and the same company, by the way), are to fit solar charging panels to selected models from next year. Sounds like a good idea to me. From the pictures I’ve seen it looks like it will just be the roof that will become a solar panel but why not make the whole of the car a solar panel?

 

Seems to make more sense but what do I know? I guess the cost of repairs would sky-rocket. Anyway, I wasn’t aware of the fact that this has been tried before but technology in this area has moved on considerably making it cheaper and more efficient than when first trialled.

 

The two companies will be offering it on petrol and diesel engine’d cars (not sure why) as well as hybrid and fully electric cars. First to have the technology will be hybrid cars. The manufacturers reckon that the solar panel will be capable of charging 30-60% of the battery during a day in the sunshine.

 

This stored energy can then be used to reduce the engine use and thus fuel consumption. A thumbs up for this one! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks

Plans For Driverless Cars On Our Roads

Saturday, 16. February 2019

If you ever fly from Gatwick Airport and travel there by train you will arrive at the South Terminal. If you then have to get to the North Terminal you jump on the very efficient shuttle that travels between the two terminals. It’s all electric, it’s driverless and it travels on rails at a speed just north of a healthy walking pace.

 

And even then, in the firm knowledge that no-one can step in front of the train, there are no road signs to read, no traffic lights to watch or emergency road works to negotiate I still get nervous. So it was a shocking injection of reality to find that there are very serious plans to move the UK to the front of the driverless car development by proposing legislation that would allow self-driving cars loose on our roads.

 

Trials have been taking place since 2015 in parts of London, Milton Keynes, Bristol and Coventry but not to the levels being proposed by the Department for Transport who have probably never sat on the Gatwick shuttle. To date all cars had to have a driver in the car when being trialled but proposed new legislation will allow completely driverless cars to be trialled on public roads without a rail in sight.

 

They believe that there will be completely driverless cars available by 3035 with the industry worth £52 billion in the UK and £907 million globally – could I have hit on the real reason for wanting to be first out of the blocks. Matthew Avery from Thatcham Research who have a bit of knowledge about car safety said, ‘Safety must not be compromised to achieve leadership position’.

 

And if you are really looking for assurances and comfort the DfT said that companies and organisations wishing to conduct driverless trials must liaise with police and local authorities, and experiments must be paused, scaled down or stopped ‘during investigations or following an incident’. So if I understand that remark they are expecting ‘incidents’, how reassuring is that?

 

Call me old fashioned but this is one development that I’m certainly not looking forward to! By Graham Hill

Share My Blogs With Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Alltagz
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • Squidoo
  • MyShare
  • YahooBuzz
  • De.lirio.us
  • Wikio UK
  • Print
  • Socializer
  • blogmarks