The Best Car Finance Blog In The World

In the course of a week, I’ve had two clients signing up contracts and having to send off their driving licences with the signed documents, only to find that their licences showed their old address.

There are 1.5 million motorists with driving licences showing the driver’s old address. Whilst this has dropped from 2.6 million in 2014 that’s still a lot of people who could be facing fines of £1,000.

You could be stopped for any reason requiring you to provide your driving licence at which time you could be fined if your address isn’t current. As one newspaper pointed out if the police could find a way to identify the drivers with licences showing the wrong address the fines could provide income of £1.5 billion.

If you find the address is out of date you can renew by following the instructions after clicking on the link below. It is free to change your address and you can continue to drive whilst the change is being processed:

https://www.gov.uk/change-address-driving-licence/apply-by-post

Do it now!! By Graham Hill

This week we saw the Government announcing some new initiatives to enable them to get to their 2040 target of no more petrol or diesel cars on our roads. Whilst they are trying to make the right noises in truth I don’t think they give a damn. Or maybe I’ve got it wrong.

A few years ago in an attempt to get us into diesel cars, we saw scrappage schemes that took us out of old chuggers and put us into new or newer cars but incentives to get us into electric cars seem to have missed the mark. Electric cars are so much more expensive than their equivalent petrol or diesel car to manufacture that even with the subsidies applied the cars they are still too expensive.

They are cheap enough to run at the moment if you charge from home but given the fact that most cars aren’t achieving their range and the cost of charging at public and filling station charge points is now incredibly high it costs less per mile in fuel to run a petrol or diesel car than an electric car.

I’m sure that it’s for these reasons that just 7,441 electric cars were registered in the first 6 months of this year which was fewer than the same period in 2017. So it seems that the Government stance has changed to push Ultra Low Emission Vehicles (ULEV). These are ‘vehicles with pure-electric engines, plug-in hybrid engines or cars with CO2 emissions lower than 75g/km at the tailpipe’.

Another interpretation comes from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders’ (SMMT) who say that they ULEV’s are ‘vehicles using low-carbon technologies; emitting less than 74g of CO2 from the tailpipe; capable of operating in zero tailpipe emission mode for a minimum of 10 miles’.

It is all very confusing. To make matters worse the Government has announced that it will now settle for ‘at least 50%’ of new cars being ultra-low emissions by 2030. But as Mike Rutherford of Auto Express points out, surely this leaves the door open for the other 50% to be medium or high emissions vehicles?

As for the 2040 ban on petrol and diesel, that is looking decidedly dodgy as the biggest growth area is in the petrol hybrid cars and with no petrol the hybrids won’t work. So is that target in the toilet?

In their plans the Government has made a promise to ensure that all new homes will have an electric charge point fitted. Hmm, how does that work with flats that have fewer parking spaces than flats in the building? In fact I’m told that some new city flats are built with no parking at all. As Mr Rutherford suggests, possible on-balcony parking or maybe in the hanging baskets – we get the message. Clearly, the Government doesn’t.

Finally, in their disinterested way, they’ve said that all new street lights will have charging points fitted. They clearly haven’t so much as looked outside their windows or driven around their local town or city to notice two things. Firstly that most lighted areas are the most dangerous, on double yellow lines, pedestrian areas, dangerous bends etc.

A glance out of my window shows that all the new energy efficient lamps that were installed a couple of years ago emerge from the pavement on the opposite side to the road. This will mean that when charging a cable will lay across the pavement.

I think the Government should start to get serious or pass over planning for electrification to an organisation like the AA or RAC to get to grips with the problem. By Graham Hill

Highways England has announced that it is falling into line with the EU proposition to digitise the road networks thus setting a single standard of road networks that would stretch from the UK across the rest of Europe. Through sensors and wireless tech the network will be able to communicate and interact with individual cars.

Informing drivers of traffic delays ahead, temperature, road surface conditions and will even be able to inform and direct emergency services to accidents. According to Auto Express here are a few of the things planned:

1. Road sensors installed in studs or railings to convey messages to cars and help steer autonomous vehicles in future.
2. Big Data will help to predict traffic movements, prevent congestion from building up and warn drivers in individual cars to take another route. I thought that could be done already!
3. Potholes could be detected at once as the road would be able to report damage. Currently, patrols go out every few weeks to check for damage.
4. Sensor Tech could make it possible for heavy goods vehicles to ‘Platoon’. This allows lorries to travel in tight formation with fewer drivers saving fuel.
5. Self-repairing roads are something else that Highways England is currently trialling. This would reduce roadworks and costs.
6. Road charging would be possible with connected roads. This has already been suggested as a replacement for the road fund licence.

Sounds quite amazing! By Graham Hill

We are awaiting the results of a £7 million traffic lights trial on the M62 where it meets the M6. We’ve all seen the traffic lights installed on motorway sliproads at times of peak traffic  in order to regulate traffic flow.

Well, the same principle is being used on the M62 where it meets the M6 but the lights control all lanes of the motorway rather than just a slip road and work in conjunction with information signs and variable speed limits.

Highways England believe that these measures will ‘provide smoother traffic flows’ and if successful will be rolled out across the whole of the UK wherever 2 motorways merge. Traffic levels are currently hitting an all-time high so anything that can reduce the bottlenecks will be welcomed by motorists. But traffic lights on motorways – could that be a step too far? By Graham Hill

I get very worked up over this subject and I’m really pleased that the Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has now issued warnings to all car manufacturers over Safety Recalls after the disgraceful attitude towards safety displayed by Vauxhall and BMW over recent months.

Before I get to the meat of this piece do you know what a safety recall is? Briefly, if a car is found to have a problem and the manufacturer, through its harvesting of statistics, finds that the fault appears on a lot of cars of the same model manufactured over a specific period of time, they will find a fix then issue a recall to all the current owners of cars that potentially carry the same fault in order to have the fix applied.

Now, this could be something simple like a boot lid having to be slammed to close or the intermittent wipe on a rear windscreen wiper not functioning. These are called technical recalls and not so critical as the potential for a car to catch light in certain circumstances or a gearbox to fail at speed. This type of recall is a safety recall and it is these that the DVSA are tightening up on.

A recall can occur at any time, in the case of the BMW safety recall it applied to cars built between 2007 and 2011 so this isn’t restricted to just new or nearly new cars.

This all follows the highly publicised cases of the Vauxhall Zafira model B’s that caught light and the BMW’s that had an electrical fault caused by a B+ battery connector. Neither Vauxhall nor BMW were prepared to acknowledge the faults until BBC’s Watchdog got involved and exposed the problems.

So to start with shame on Vauxhall and BMW. In the case of BMW Narayan Gurung lost his life when he hit a tree trying to avoid a broken down BMW as a result of this known fault. Following the accident BMW recalled 36,000 vehicles, it was only after the Watchdog show that a further 312,000 vehicles were recalled.

There are two important points to be made here. Firstly the faults very rarely apply to all cars so whilst we see that a total of 348,000 cars are recalled it doesn’t mean that all the cars have the fault. Having said that we don’t know until the cars are inspected whether the car has the fault or not, so even though you haven’t experienced the brake fault or electrical fault that doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t return your car to a main dealer to have it checked.

If you don’t you could be putting yours, your passengers and third party’s lives at risk. The new rules imposed on manufacturers by the DVSA means that once a safety-critical fault is known the manufacturers have just 10 days to issue a recall notice or face prosecution and a fine.

DVSA CEO Gareth Llewellyn has made it clear that when the 10 day warning has been issued it will also be made public, unless the manufacturer can give a good reason why the recall shouldn’t be made. This will put pressure on the manufacturers to take action. The situation gets a little more complicated when a company car driver isn’t made aware of a recall as the notice would be served on the company that owns or leases the cars.

Whoever is responsible for the company vehicles will be held responsible and if a recall isn’t conveyed to the driver and the car inspected he can be fined up to £20,000 and face 3 months in prison. I hope that the DVSA gets tough on manufacturers who seem to take a very casual approach when dealing with life-threatening safety recalls.

It should also be pointed out that if a car has a recall notice on it and the driver doesn’t have it inspected it could invalidate your insurance. Something that few people are aware of.

If you would like to check the MOT history of your car and whether there are any outstanding recalls you can check online by entering your registration number. Go to: https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/

Whilst I believe that there have been suggestions along the lines that recall notices should be checked at the time of the car’s MOT test it doesn’t cover cars during the first 3 years of a car’s life. Maybe that should also apply to those servicing your vehicle also, they should check at the same time. By Graham Hill

Finally, after banging the drum for the last two years, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling has agreed with my views that diesel still has a part to play, especially when the Bosche system starts to find its way into new car production. By 2020 when the Bosche system is fully rolled out across all manufacturers the NOx emissions will be a tenth of that required when Euro 7 rules are introduced making diesel cars more environmentally friendly than petrol.

In the meantime,, Nissan hasn’t helped by being caught out doing something similar to VW and falsifying emissions tests in Japan. That aside Chris Grayling supported diesels by saying, ‘If you’re driving long distances and are out and about on the road for work, diesel is a perfectly sensible option.’

The Government is aiming for zero emissions by 2040 but as Grayling pointed out this has to be industry and consumer-led and technology neutral – no I haven’t got a clue either but that’s what he said. But he went on to say, ‘Diesels can still play a valuable role in reducing CO2 emissions during that transition period to a low-emission future.’

However, Grayling told the SMMT that diesel engines need to continue getting cleaner. The response from the SMMT was to question whether his views would translate into positive changes to the tax regime. The Government promised to remove the 3% diesel company car supplement from April 2016.

However, not only was that decision reversed in the wake of the VW emissions scandal it was increased to 4% from April 2018. Of course, if I was being cynical I would say that the UK Government along with Germany and France have allowed false information to circulate in order to penalise drivers of diesel cars.

However, this attempt at crucifying diesel drivers will end up biting them on the rear end because diesel car sales have dropped through the floorboards leaving them with far fewer drivers to rob. Time will tell how this argument pans out but I’m pleased that the Government has come out positively. By Graham Hill

The RAC Foundation is to receive funding from the Department for Transport (DfT) to look into the ways that accidents, resulting in fatalities and injuries, are investigated in order to find out the genuine cause and how the accidents may be prevented in the future.

£480,000 is being invested in the project allowing the Foundation to recruit the services of specialists and use sophisticated data analytics to come to more accurate conclusions. For example, speed may result in an accident but why was the driver speeding?

Was there a distraction, a fault with the car or simply trying to meet unrealistic appointment or delivery targets set by an employer? Beyond individual cases, the data will be used to identify patterns relating to the make and model of car, the driver, temperature, time of day, road conditions, number of passengers etc.

By analysing the accidents in a totally different way to the police, who are looking to apportion blame, they are hoping to have a positive effect on the number of accidents and the outcomes. Let me be clear, accidents resulting in death or injury are down massively.

In 2016 the number of deaths was 1,792, up 4% over 2015 but compared to 10 years earlier the death rate is down 44%. However, the rates are starting to flatline so new ideas have to be developed if we are to bring them down further. The RAC Foundation believe they will be having a positive effect very soon.

They are introducing some of the techniques that accident investigation teams use when working for Maritime, Air and Rail organisations when trying to find the cause of a crash. By having an independent body it will take a lot out of time spent by the police investigating accidents leaving them to get on with other duties. By Graham Hill

It is now getting ridiculous. How long are we going to allow local Government to demonise diesel and force drivers to pay unfair penalties for driving cars that just a couple of years ago the Government was encouraging consumers and businesses to drive?

There is now little to choose between diesel and petrol cars when it comes to environmental damage. Last year saw CO2 output from cars rise for the first time since records began and for the first time in years we saw warnings issued about the damage that petrol cars could be causing to the Ozone layer as a result of increased CO2.

And with some particulate filters believed to allow zero soot emissions from the exhaust of diesel cars it seems ridiculous to demonise the cars and punish the drivers the way that local authorities do. London councils are leading the way when it comes to hating diesel cars (or loving them in terms of increased income).

Charging extra for older (pre-2005) cars to enter the central London congestion charge area may seem to make a little bit of sense but some boroughs charge premiums for parking permits for diesels irrespective of their age.

Merton charges an annual surcharge of £115 for all diesel cars, Islington is £99.65 and Hackney is £50. Kensington and Chelsea and Lambeth charge £43 and £40 respectively for pre-Euro 6 diesels. Camden and Barnet charge a surcharge on all diesels.

The problem is that this unjustified surcharge could well spread across the rest of the UK as local authorities see the opportunity to rip off diesel drivers and add to their income.  By Graham Hill

It seems that a lot of claims could be turned down because drivers aren’t making complete and honest returns on their insurance proposal forms.

Saying that a car is stored in a garage overnight when there isn’t enough space to store a bike in your garage could cause a claim to be rejected. It now seems that even silly things can lead to an insurance company rejecting a perfectly normal claim.

In some extreme examples, explained by one of my colleagues on Rip Off Britain, an insurer could reject a claim because you didn’t mention that the car was fitted with a tow bar or a roof or cycle rack. Even if the part fitted had nothing to do with the accident you could still have a claim thrown out.

The most ridiculous and extreme examples include the fixing of stickers and say company adverts or logos, regarded as ‘adjustments to the bodywork’. So be warned, better to advise than not. By Graham Hill

As you get older it’s pretty common knowledge that you become more grumpy. I like to think that I’m not grumpy but I probably am.

However, alongside being grumpy – or not in my case, I find myself worrying more about things around us than I ever did when I was younger.

I worry about the health service, possibly because I’m no doubt getting closer to the time when I could become reliant on it. I worry about our kids’ education and the way we don’t prepare them for the real world.

Kids should have better life skills such as opening a bank account, credit cards and how they work along with debt advice including car finance – right the way through to basic cooking skills, how to iron, get a passport and especially, with so many youngsters dying on our roads, attending a speed awareness course – BEFORE they start driving.

I worry about the environment and I worry about the disgraceful state of our roads. Accidents are happening daily as a result of poorly maintained roads but what are we doing about these avoidable accidents? Naff all.

The SMMT suggests that there are 37.7 million vehicles on our roads but I agree with Mike Rutherford who writes for Auto Express that if you take into account drivers on our roads driving cars that are unregistered and the many more foreign trucks delivering bits from Europe massively outnumbering the number of our trucks in Europe we probably have over 40 million vehicles on our roads?

We are not only running out of space but the roads we have are a disgrace with potholes big enough to drop an elephant into without it touching the sides. I know there are many other things to worry about but if we don’t get our roads in good repair and build new, wider roads the whole of our road transport system will come to a standstill. Having travelled on the M25 last week I think it already has! By Graham Hill